Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Bataille and historical gratitude

Bataille had learned a lot from Nietzsche, and was big on making the legacy of history work for him, even when it seemed to be negative.

Thus, he understood the position of the worker as in some ways more advantageous than that of his employer, since the worker had knowledge of the nature of material reality in the way the employer didn't.

Thus, also, he took the nature of oppression, including the internalization of oppression as superego, as a providing situations laden with potential for exploration and gratification. He labeled these tendencies, to explore and self-gratify under circumstances that were oppressive overall, as "transgression".

The courage to go beyond (what is allowed)


THE NATURE OF 'THE TRAGIC'

When I began researching my thesis, I believed in psychological weakness. By the end of it, I didn’t. I thought, “Every animal, including those that are human, fight for their survival with everything they have.” To succeed or fail is only defined by circumstantial weakness, I concluded, rarely inherent weakness. This is related to a particularly Nietzschean insight, where creativity is viewed as tending towards the tragic, as it is directly related to a tendency to go beyond circumscribed limits -- and thus to create tragic outcomes. Failure is all the more likely — but this is not, at all, the same as “weakness”.

Zarathustra, however, looked at the people and wondered. Then he spake thus:

Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Superman–a rope over an abyss.

A dangerous crossing, a dangerous wayfaring, a dangerous looking-back, a dangerous trembling and halting.

What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal: what is lovable in man is that he is an OVER-GOING and a DOWN-GOING.

I love those that know not how to live except as down-goers, for they are the over-goers.

I love the great despisers, because they are the great adorers, and arrows of longing for the other shore.

I love those who do not first seek a reason beyond the stars for going down and being sacrifices, but sacrifice themselves to the earth, that the earth of the Superman may hereafter arrive.

I love him who liveth in order to know, and seeketh to know in order that the Superman may hereafter live. Thus seeketh he his own down-going.

I love him who laboureth and inventeth, that he may build the house for the Superman, and prepare for him earth, animal, and plant: for thus seeketh he his own down-going.

I love him who loveth his virtue: for virtue is the will to down-going, and an arrow of longing.

I love him who reserveth no share of spirit for himself, but wanteth to be wholly the spirit of his virtue: thus walketh he as spirit over the bridge.

I love him who maketh his virtue his inclination and destiny: thus, for the sake of his virtue, he is willing to live on, or live no more.

I love him who desireth not too many virtues. One virtue is more of a virtue than two, because it is more of a knot for one’s destiny to cling to.

Silly Site o’ the Day

So when I was picking up my comics yesterday I got interviewed for Marvel Radio, which is apparently a real thing in the world even though I can't look it up because I'm not a subscriber. I plugged the heck out of my husband's work, as he's done numerous jobs for Marvel over the years and would love to work with them again, but I do wish I'd said more about women in comics (my Friends of Lulu skills seem to be out of practice) and especially that I'd known about this, as I would have plugged it to the hilt:



Via the true believers at the Merry Marvel BoingBoing Society.
Tagged with:

Why Do We Call on God When We Come? An Essay on Faith and Sexual Ethics

In the summer of 2008, I put up a three-part series on Christian sexual ethics. These posts have remained popular, and nearly four years on, I’ve revised them slightly.

Part One: “Do Me, Do Me Right”: part one (very long) of a three-part series on Christianity and sexual ethics

Part Two: “The battery that powers our lives”: more on sex, faith, justice

Part Three: “I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear”: of Scripture, the Spirit, and Christian sexual ethics

Tagged with:

Car Dreams


In two years my car will be old enough to vote.  But my car dreams are not about finding a replacement or trying to figure out how to live without a car.  That part is taken care with the rational part of my brainz.

My dreams are about something different.  For instance, I have always wanted a car that could be shrunk to a little attache case on wheels for parking purposes.  Or alternatively, a car which has retractable stork legs which grow out of the bottom when the car needs to be parked.  Then one could just hop across all the parked cars and settle somewhere on the second floor so to speak.

And even before car manufacturers installed balloons in cars I thought that external balloons would be a great idea, as a form of defense against butt-flies and other careless drivers in traffic.  They would have been transparent balloons naturally.

A different set of dreams has to do with desiring a BMW.   Eat my smoke!

And the memory of the one time I  test-drove a 1950s Daimler.  It had real burl walnut in the dashboard...




The Difference Between “i.e.” and “e.g.”

Every once in a while we post something for those of us who are teaching (and learning) how to write.  This is one of those times.

Get it!  Because you use “i.e.” to mean “what I mean to say is” and you use “e.g.” to mean “for example.”  Cute.

From Learn Something New Every Day.

—————————

Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

(View original at http://thesocietypages.org/socimages)

National Review Takes Down False Plagiarism Charge Against Elizabeth Warren

Conservatives will try anything, including a fake plagiarism charge against Elizabeth Warren. This one didn't last long. Heh.

 CORRECTION

The National Review’s fake plagiarism scoop 

 
Bookmark and Share

Classics Club #4: Wilkie Collins’s No Name

Everybody knows this Victorian novelist for his ultra-popular The Moonstone and The Woman in White. However, Wilkie Collins’s lesser known novels are also worth reading. As part of the Classics Challenge, I have read his novel No Name and now regret not placing more of Collins’s books on my Classics list. In my opinion, No Name is a lot better than both of the author’s more popular novels, and I wonder why it isn’t better known.

The greatest achievement of the novel is the protagonist, Magdalen Vanstone. World literature hasn’t produced many images of strong, resourceful, intelligent women. This is why rare exceptions such as Collins’s heroine are so priceless. Magdalen is a woman with a cause, a plan, a dream that she pursues single-mindedly and without any reservations. Thankfully, this dream does not consist of snagging a rich husband with a big mansion, which makes Magdalen very unlike the insipid protagonists of Austin’s novels.

No Name has a very complex plot where two powerful, resourceful women scheme against each other. At a first glance, it seems that the object of their scheming is money. However, one soon realizes that it isn’t about money at all for either of the heroines. Of course, as women of the comfortable, educated class of society, they need some financial means to maintain an existence that will not be too degrading to their sensibilities. However, their struggle for the inheritance allows them to exercise their intelligence in a way that no other pursuits available to women of their class at the time would be able to do.

The ending of the novel is particularly curious. Behind an apparent concession to the patriarchal norms presenting women as pathetic, fragile flowers, the readers can see an alternative vision of reality, one where women remain untamed and undaunted no matter what befalls them.

It’s interesting how the novels with weak and pathetic female characters survive and preserve their popularity a lot better than novels with powerful and complex female protagonists. Everybody is besotted with the inane, weak and weepy protagonists of Pride and Prejudice  Anna Karenina, Madame Bovary, etc. but who has heard of Magdalen Vanstone and Aurora Floyd? Bear in mind that the absolute majority of the readership of these novels is and has always been female.


Filed under: Uncategorized
Tagged with:

Enough on Personalities!

It’s only May but the way the presidential campaign is conducted on both sides has already degenerated to extremely trivial discussions of personalities instead of an intelligent analysis of political and economic programs and positions. The number of times I have heard about Romney’s dog and his teenage pranks is daunting. And yesterday I turned on the Fox News (N. is convinced it is a comedy channel and watches it whenever we stay in the hotel as postprandial entertainment) and saw a long program where people pretended to be scandalized by the text of Obama’s autobiography that has been on the bestseller list  for 4 years. In hushed voices, they informed the country that Obama smoked a few reefers in high school and even – oh, horror! – once extinguished a cigarette butt on a carpet.

Seriously, folks, haven’t we heard enough of carpets that were burned and dogs that were transported carelessly thirty years ago? I have a feeling that after the stories of the candidates’ college years get milked for all they are worth, we will start hearing scandalized reports of how Romney took a toy truck away from another little boy at the age of two and Obama ate too much ice-cream at the age of four. I wonder who will be the first unintelligent commentator to use such childhood stories as proof of Romney’s capitalist greed and Obama’s Socialist self-indulgence.


Filed under: Uncategorized
Tagged with:

Intervention

About a year and a half ago, as I walked home after work at about 11 PM, I passed a couple talking about thirty feet from the entrance to my building. The woman was leaning with her back against the drivers side front window of one of the vehicles parked on the street; her bag was on the car’s roof. The man stood in front of her, close enough that she couldn’t easily move away, with his right hand planted firmly on the spot where the front and rear doors met. Clearly they were arguing, but his other hand was not raised and he did not raise his voice. Nor did she, in any immediately recognizable way, seem intimidated, though they were standing outside the circle of light cast by the streetlamp, so I couldnt see her face. They appeared to be, simply, a couple whod walked out of the restaurant around the corner from my house, which that night was hosting some kind of dance party, to have an argument. I passed by without giving them much further thought.

As soon as I walked up the steps leading to my building, though, he yelled something in Spanish and I heard what sounded like his hand being slammed, flat and hard, against the roof of the car they’d been leaning on. I stopped and listened for about fifteen seconds. It was quiet. I peaked around the tree that was blocking them from my sight and they were standing more or less as they had been when I first walked past them. I waited a little bit longer, and, when nothing else happened, walked into the lobby. Again, as soon as I did so–you’d think the timing had been rehearsed–he started yelling at her again, and this time, from the sound of shaking metal, he was hitting as he did so the alternate side of the street parking sign that was right next to where they were standing.

I stepped back outside just in time to see the two of them walk side-by-side past my building’s entrance. I stepped onto the sidewalk to watch them. He had her purse in one hand and her upper arm in the other and the slump in her shoulders sure looked to me like she knew she had no choice but to allow herself to be led away. Then, as if he felt my eyes on the back of his head, the man turned around, took a few steps towards me and said, the invitation to provoke him into more than words more than obvious in his voice, “What are you looking at?”

He was at least 15-20 years younger than I am, big, though maybe not quite as big as I am, and I have no idea what I would have done if he’d attacked me. It was late; I was very tired; my cellphone battery was dead; every light in my building was off; and I knew my wife and my son were sleeping. The last time I was in a fistfight, believe it or not, was third grade. No matter how good a fight I might have been able to put up, in other words, there was no doubt in my mind that I would be on the losing end of it. So I didn’t say anything to him.

He took another step or two towards me, “Mind your own fucking business, okay? This has nothing to do with you.”

Again, I didn’t answer.

“Look this is not between you and me,” he yelled, and I wondered if he’d woken up anyone else in my building. “It’s between us,” he said, leaning forward, pushing his chest out towards me and gesturing with his hand towards himself and the woman, who was standing, silent and unmoving, a few feet behind him.

“Then you don’t need to hurt her,” I said.

“What the fuck? I’m not hurting her.” He waved his hand dismissively. “Just go home.” It was an order he expected me to follow, not a reassurance that everything was okay; and then he turned back towards the woman, who turned with him, and he hung his arm over her shoulders, pulling her towards him and saying something into her ear as they walked down the block, neither of them looking back in my direction. I watched them for about 20 seconds, went back into my building, took the elevator upstairs and stood by the window listening to hear if there were any further outbursts, but there were none. So I made myself some tea and watched a little television to unwind before getting ready for bed.

I’m not sure that I have much to say about this story, except that every time I try to tease something out of it, I discover that it’s quite a complicated little knot. On the one hand, I do not regret stepping out into the street to be a witness, even if the couple was, simply, a couple having an argument. Nor do I think the initial assumption I made—that there was in him the threat of violence against her—was wrong. It’s much better to be wrong about something like that than not to do anything. On the other hand, though, if I was right, what good did I actually do? Nothing had happened that warranted calling the police; and if he had attacked me for “interfering,” odds are he would have beaten me up. That might have gotten him arrested for assault—if someone saw it and called the cops and they were able to catch him—but it’s not at all clear that it would have made any difference to the woman he was with.

I realize that there’s an analysis of a situation like this which says my presence shifted the focus of violence to where it “should” be in a male dominant culture, between men—and, in theory at least, a part of me agrees with that—but I’m not sure that analysis does much good if I end up bloody and beaten and he goes home and takes his ire out even more forcefully on his female companion.

When I finally got into bed that night, I kept replaying the moment when he hung his arm over his companion’s shoulders and I realized I couldn’t tell for sure if the gesture was familiar, intimate, meaning something like, Look, it’s over. Let’s go home, making his bluster towards me a simple case male posturing; or, if he was actually putting her in a chokehold, the meaning of which, I assume, is obvious. So much of what happened, at least as I remember it, suggests the second reading is accurate, but I could not and cannot be sure. And that haunts me.