Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Posts by Chally

Following up on the Sydney feminist blogger meet-up

Some folks who couldn’t make it requested that the picnic be blogged, so here we are!

We had loads of fun with much conversation (oh, you wish you were there for the discussion of Middle English slash, I know how you do) and laughter and food. I was particularly taken with the boob cupcakes made by the news with nipples, which were both hilarious and delicious. I was kind of amazed that we had so many people come who live outside Sydney: Bridget came especially from Bathurst and we were fortunate enough to have timed it so that folks from Canberra, New Zealand and the United States could be there, too!

It was a beautiful sunny day and it was fabulous to put some faces to names as well as to catch up with some people I hadn’t seen in a while. Thank you so, so much to those who came, it was a real pleasure to see you all. Hopefully we can do this again sometime.

Just a lost property notice: a black bag was left behind. If it’s yours and you would like it returned, email me at chally [dot] zeroatthebone [at] gmail [dot] com and I shall put you in touch with she who has it.

Happy birthday, tigtog!

It is the birthday of our rather incredible (jaw-droppingly so) tech whiz, tigtog of Hoyden About Town! On this glorious occasion, Rufus Sewell presents her with a birthday candle!

A picture of a bearded Rufus Sewell, holding a large candle.

And I present her with my best wishes for a wonderful year ahead. You may present the same in comments!

Not so much, no.

Reader April sent in an article from the LA Times (thanks!) called Medical treatment carries possible side effect of limiting homosexuality. You know this isn’t going to go well already, don’t you? It begins with this:

Each year in the United States, perhaps a few dozen pregnant women learn they are carrying a fetus at risk for a rare disorder known as congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The condition causes an accumulation of male hormones and can, in females, lead to genitals so masculinized that it can be difficult at birth to determine the baby’s gender.

Well, anyone could tell you that’s it’s difficult to tell someone’s gender at birth as they’re not yet capable of expressing it to you. And I’m not too enamoured of the unqualified grouping of “male” and “female,” either. Anyhow! A daily hormone pill has been developed that can be taken by pregnant people whose fetuses may have CAH. Meanwhile, a 2008 study found that, compared with a control group of relatives without the condition, there were proportionally higher numbers of lesbian and bisexual women among those with congenital adrenal hyperplasia ‘who were not treated prenatally’. There is some concern that this pill will be used by parents who wish their children to be heterosexual.

That such a treatment would ever be considered, even to prevent genital abnormalities, has outraged gay and lesbian groups, troubled some doctors and fueled bioethicists’ debate about the nature of human sexuality.

Rightfully so has the idea of a treatment that may reduce the chance of someone being gay provoked outrage and troubled minds. I don’t think we can say that sexual orientation is a totally prenatally-determined thing, but that’s really besides the point here: the idea of people wanting to take pills in order to determine sexual orientation is a disturbing one. But that’s far from being the only disturbing thing going on here. ‘Even to prevent genital abnormalities’. That’s just waved away as a given in the article, and in general: it’s supposedly a given that genitalia that don’t fit certain norms are a possibility everyone would want to get rid of, like they’re so “abnormal” that it’s not even worth thinking through. And with the way this article frames the issue, it’s tossing intersex rights aside and positioning queer rights as the primary thing that is going on here, taking up a fair portion of the piece. There’s no good reason why both can’t be focussed on.

There is an intersex advocate interviewed in the article, an Anne Tamar-Mattis. Tamar-Mattis is executive director of Advocates for Informed Choice, an organisation aimed, according to the AIC website, at ‘promoting the civil rights of children born with variations of sexual anatomy’. But Tamar-Mattis’ contribution is framed in a section of the article aimed at exploring the hormone treatment as an alternative to surgery. Her words are largely backed into a corner here, really. The article doesn’t leave a whole lot of room – only about a sentence – for the idea that intersex people might decide on their own terms, might want to keep their genitals as they are.

Getting back to what I was saying at the start, the article frames those individuals with CAH as girls, females, assuming that they all identify that way. Already slotting them into a box, this is indicative of the idea that intersex people are an aberration, that they must be pushed into somewhere, that they are inevitably girls with something different. I’m sure many or most people with the condition identify as girls or women, but the wording here assumes this is the case for everyone, pushing all other possibilities out. It’s just one of the reasons I grit my teeth when people are referred to as “females” or some such!

I’m feeling some ableism, too.

Undetected, the abnormality can make both male and female infants critically ill within a few weeks of birth because of an associated salt loss through the urine. The defective enzyme also causes a deficiency of the hormone cortisol, which can affect heart function, and an increase in androgens produced by the adrenal glands.

There are not a lot of things in this world that keep me awake at night. One of them is being told people should not be allowed to exist, would be better off not existing, should be something else, because some part of their body or who they are is defective. It is not as though being ill is the worst thing in all existence, either, as though people with affected heart function deserve to not exist, to be altered in order to prevent illness. Wanting to disappear people with medical conditions is an attitude I find nauseating.

There’s a lot more to unpack in this article, but I think I’ll leave that to you lot. What do you think?

Sydney feminist blogger meet-up update!

This coming Sunday, 29 August, we’re having a meet-up in Sydney! You do not need to be a blogger or a regular commenter or anything to come, you just need to want to come hang out with some like-minded folks for a few hours. You can check out the full details in my announcement post. A quick summary of the details: We’re meeting at 11am on the 29th, in Victoria Park (which in the grounds of the University of Sydney) on Parramatta Rd. As to where precisely: there’s a big bridge across the lake; we’ll be meeting to the right of that. (That is, the right as you face Parramatta Rd, but don’t worry, we’ll be next to the bridge and pretty conspicuous.) As to how to get there and accessibility details, see the previous post.

We’re going to be sitting around and chatting, picnic-style! So bring some blankets/chairs and your own food to eat as these things will not be supplied. Well, I’ll be making a gluten-free cheesecake to share, but you yourself are definitely not obliged to share food.

But what, you say, of a wet weather plan? It does not look as though it will be raining. In the event that it does rain, we will not be meeting in Victoria Park but at a cafe called Deus. It’s at 98-104 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, which is not far at all from Victoria Park (here’s a Google Map). It’s on the corner of Parramatta and Lyons Rd, and the entrance – which is wheelchair accessible – is on the Lyons side. If you need any more specific directions or need to know bus routes or anything, let me know. Again, I doubt we will be heading here, but if the weather report changes, I will send an email round to everyone who has RSVPed on early Saturday evening. Obviously, if you wake up Sunday morning and it is pouring, we’re going to the cafe instead of the park! Sound good?

If you get super confused or lost on the way there, I’m going to try and keep an eye on comments here, so don’t worry too much. Any last minute RSVPs? Drop a note in comments or email me at chally [dot] zeroatthebone [at] gmail [dot] com. Family and friends are most welcome. I am so looking forward to seeing you all!

Shameless Self-Promotion Sunday

(Well, it’s 8.30 Monday morning here, but whatever!) Gentle readers, feel free to drop links to blog posts you’ve written over the last week. Link to specific pieces, not just your whole blog.

Not quite sure how this HTML deal works? Just use this as an example: <a href=http://BlogPostAddress.com>BlogPostTitle</a>

On Centring Caregivers in Disability Discourse

It’s really off-putting when a group of disabled people are trying to have a conversation and a caregiver butts in with “you’re wrong. I know, because I care for someone with such and such a disability”. This makes me squirm. Even worse are those disability organisations or charities that have only parents and caregivers on their boards. “Oh, but it’s all right, my brother has this condition. In fact, we all have family members with this condition!”

It’s troubling enough that there are so many such organisations out there that just don’t have anyone who actually has the disability concerned on their boards – it’s as though we can’t speak for ourselves or have unique experiences people who don’t have our disabilities can’t relate to or advocate about! – but that’s not directly what I want to talk about today. I want to talk about who gets to run conversations about disability and who gets to run the narratives. All too frequently, abled caregivers and family members are centered in conversations that really ought to be run by and focus on disabled people.

The thing is, abled caregivers and family members, while pretty involved in the lives of those they are caring for, have their own perspectives, which is great. But treating those perspectives like substitutes for those of disabled people themselves makes me really uneasy. So when the perspectives of disabled people get pushed out because carers are brought to the forefront – in legislating, in daily conversation, in interviews – for me, that’s a clear example of ableism run rampant. Because it seems like those in charge think that disabled people aren’t worth listening to or are incapable of informing their own opinions. The dominant narrative is that abled people are better worth listening to, and I get sad when abled carers and parents just don’t seem to realise that they’re dominating conversations at the expense of disabled people. (It reminds me of those times when men start talking loudly about feminism and everyone else in the room has to keep quiet, is denied a chance to speak.) And “advocacy” of disabled people shouldn’t be at the expense of disabled people.

Of course, it’s usually particular kinds of caregivers who get centred – who centre themselves – in these conversations: abled ones. As ever, it is those with multiple roles who are pushed to the margins, because their existence is held to be just too complicated to deal with. I think acknowledging disabled people who are also caregivers would be a really good start to decentralising the place of abled caregivers in these conversations. Moreover, acknowledging the multifaceted nature of experience brings out the nuance: we really have to engage with the dynamics of different people’s situations here – what are the power dynamics like when you’re both in a position of power and disabled? how do these conversations apply to you? – rather than defaulting to listening to abled parents and caregivers.

Now, I’m not saying that abled caregivers and such should have no place in conversations about disability and ableism, you understand: I’m saying that such folk have dominated conversations about these matters. There is a place, it just shouldn’t be a place that replicates the hierarchies present in society already: hierarchies around who gets to speak, who gets to do the representing. The effect of this – and you can look at a range of newspaper articles or documentaries or whatever you please – is that disabled people get silenced. The effect is that, more often than not, it becomes all about portraying the caregiver as angelic and the person cared for as a burden they have kindly taken on.

And that’s not on.

[Cross-posted at Zero at the Bone and FWD/Forward]

Sydney, Australia feminist blogger meet-up on 29 August!

Announcing a meet-up for feminist blog folk in the Sydney region. You don’t need to write a blog yourself or be a regular commenter or anything, it’s just an invitation to come and hang out with some like-minded folk for a couple of hours.

Here are the details:

When? Sunday, 29 August, at 11am.
Where? Victoria Park, in the grounds of the University of Sydney, on Parramatta Rd. It’s just opposite Broadway shopping center and the start of Glebe Point Rd. As to where precisely: there’s a big bridge across the lake; we’ll be meeting to the right of that. (That is, the right as you face Parramatta Rd, but don’t worry, we’ll be next to the bridge and pretty conspicuous.) As to how to get there, see below.
What are we doing? We’re going to hang out an have a chat and, for those who are inclined, a picnic! So bring some blankets/chairs and your own food to eat as these things will not be supplied!
Wet weather plan? Well, that really depends on how many people come, so I will let you know for sure when we have the numbers down. It doesn’t look like it will be raining on that day.
Accessibility: There are wide bitumen pathways and a few benches in the Park. Our wet weather plan will definitely be wheelchair accessible. If you are concerned about how to get there, find a route by calling 131500 or on http://www.131500.com.au and clicking the ‘easy access only’ button when the results of your search come up. If you have any accessibility concerns at all, please do not hesitate to email me at chally [dot] zeroatthebone [at] gmail [dot] com.

So, in order to secure that wet weather plan, I need you to RSVP very promptly so I can gauge numbers. Please respond by 14 August to say if you (and anyone you’re bringing with you) will be coming. (If you’re really not sure if you can make it, please leave a comment saying so and let me know as soon as you possibly can.) Sooner is better than later, and I’d like to get most responses within the week, please!

This meet-up was the idea of Chloe from Feministing, who’s coming back to Aus for a bit, so you have her to thank for the suggestion!

So, how to get there: You can take most buses from outside Town Hall Station and they leave frequently from Central Station. The bus will have “P’matta Rd” on its electronic display sign. It’s a big park so it’s hard to miss, but just ask someone if you’re worried!

Leave RSVPs in comments or email me: again, my email is chally [dot] zeroatthebone [at] gmail [dot] com. Don’t forget to specify if you’re bringing anyone else along; family and friends are definitely welcome!

[Cross-posted at Zero at the Bone]

Happy Birthday, Jill!

Well, what do you know, it’s Jill’s birthday today! Have a day and year both entertaining and marvellous, Jill, for you deserve it. Alas, your cake will have to be virtual:

Description: Three cupcakes in a row with fondant cats sitting on top of them. From the left, a black one with a pink belly, a white one with a black belly, and a pink one with a white belly. At the bottom, in white text with black borders, are the words "Happy Birthday, Jill!" Attribution: The original photo is by clevercupcakes on flickr.com. Shared under a Creative Commons license.

Leave your birthday wishes in comments.

Tagged with:

Interview: Heather Corinna of Scarleteen

Do you know Scarleteen? You should know Scarleteen, as it’s the most comprehensive, inclusive, all-around best sex education resource geared at younger folk I’ve ever encountered. In fact, I spent the latter end of high school referring my friends to the site and I still surf it a lot. Scarleteen has information on anatomy and relationships and consent and friendship and pleasure and all manner of things. While it is aimed at younger folk, it’s well worth a read whatever your age.

Sometimes there are projects you yourself might want to participate in, like this series around forming conversations about shared experiences between people of different ages (of, for example, abortions, queerness, different family situations, being trans, bullying, being HIV positive). They even have message boards for support and advice, not to mention a group blog! There’s a great series running on the blog called Queering Sexuality in Color, which consists of first person profiles of queer people of colour. Check out their feminist sex ed policy.

Founder Heather Corinna kindly agreed to speak with us. She’s an activist, educator and the author of S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-To-Know Progressive Sexuality Guide to Get You Through High School and College. She also co-founded All Girl Army, a group blog for girls and women from 10 to 25 years of age (the AGA is looking for new bloggers, so apply and pass the link on!). Heather’s personal site is femmerotic.com. Without further ado…

Please tell us about what Scarleteen does.

Every day, Scarleteen provides opt-in, progressive, inclusive and comprehensive sexuality, sexual health and relationship information, support and advice to around 25,000 readers and users around the world. We do that via static articles as well as interactively: via advice columns, our message boards and our text service. There are also some offshoots of all of this, like the local outreach work I do, my book, and other projects we help with. Because we’re mostly online, we can serve users who have sex ed in school already but want more (or want something different than they got), who don’t have comprehensive sex ed in school, or who aren’t in school at all, either because they homeschool or because they don’t get any kind of schooling, which is the case for millions of teens and twentysomethings all over the world every year.

Could you tell us about how feminism influences Scarleteen’s work?

I feel like it’s harder to figure how it doesn’t than how it does. Even that fact that I’m able to do any kind of work at all as a vulva-toting person obviously has a lot to do with feminism, and that we’re talking about sexuality for all people and coming from all people — not just as something to please or obey a certain social construct or one privileged group — has a lot to do with feminism. My whole interest in sexuality as something to study and work in when I was in college stemmed from my feminism — including having sexuality presented as something that had nothing to do with feminism, which I found and still find infuriating — and it’s a thread I don’t think I could ever unwind from the larger skein.

But gender inequities play SUCH a huge part in so many of the troubles we have with sexuality as cultures. They are gargantuan when it comes to sexual and interpersonal violence, in contraception and safer sex, even in the notion of whose sexuality someone’s sexuality really is. It wasn’t that long ago that everyone’s sexual behavior was seen as being only or primarily about heterosexual, cisgender men, and even though those attitudes are changing, they are changing very slowly, and still have not reached many people or cultures, including in the western world. Gender inequity has quite a lot to do with the fact that we still only have a small number of birth control methods, and nothing 100% effective, but have advanced technology to visit other planets. Gender inequity has everything to do with the way pregnancy and abortion are treated. Gender inequity has an awful lot to do with our STI rates, with how little we know about sound health for anyone who isn’t cis gender or “perfectly” XX or XY, with the increased rates of violence, homelessness and poorer health among those of us who are LGBT. Gender inequity has an awful lot to do with the way so much of sexuality is presented as being about reproduction when it’s really about pleasure.

All of that is just the tip of the iceberg, both in terms of how sexism can play a part, but also in how a world of -isms do. Because feminism is about addressing and working to correct gender inequities, and so much of the work we do is as well, it’s hard to see how we’d do what we do without feminism being central.

How did the site begin and have Scarleteen’s aims or methods changed over time?

We began through another website altogether. In early ‘98, myself and a couple other women started one of the first adult women’s sexuality sites online (the now-defunct Scarlet Letters), and in very little time at all, young people started writing to us with sexuality questions. What I ideally wanted was to refer them somewhere that could serve them specifically, but there just wasn’t anywhere online to send them TO. So, I answered the questions I could, leaning on my background as an educator, having grown up in and around healthcare, as a voracious reader and with sound sexuality information I already had at the time from life, from school and from anywhere else I could find it. In a few months, I — with the help of a couple of those women, namely Hanne Blank and Suzanne Peak — put out a small offshoot site. Naively, I figured a few pages would suffice.

Yes, as a matter of fact, I do feel very, very, VERY silly about that now. :) Between the static pages and the message boards, Scarleteen contains tens of thousands of pages and those STILL don’t answer anyone’s questions. Thankfully I’ve since wised up and realized nothing ever will, you just keep plugging away to fill gaps as best you can, knowing there will always be more.

We’re constantly in growth and flux. The model of education that we use — a model I was teaching with before I was a sexuality educator — requires that we do, because it’s based primarily on responding to what our readers and users ask us for, rather than in us deciding what people want and need based on our own ideas, agendas or from our own, anecdotal experiences. While broad public health and sexuality information informs what we do, it’s so important to us to be sure we’re serving our own population best, and so often what young people want and need is something decided by adults from adults, rather than by them and as coming from them. What young people express they want and need has some universals, but on the whole, we’ve just got to be ready to roll with wherever they take us in a day or a year.

I’ve been lucky that I’ve been able to build Scarleteen gradually as the Internet has built gradually. If I walked into doing this with this much traffic around, I would have had a heart attack. Often, I have to put the current numbers out of my own head because if I think about how many people are reading, I get struck with pretty overwhelming stage fright and a feeling of overexposure. So, that’s a way that it helps me to just and focus on the one person or small handful of people who are asking or have specifically asked for something.

As well, the other work that I do and have done, and that our volunteers do or have done, also plays a part. Coming into this with a background both as an alternative educator and a writer and artist influenced what it’s like and what we do, and work that I have done and do in the interim, like the work I’ve done at abortion clinics and the outreach I do with homeless and transient youth has influenced what both Scarleteen and myself do and how we do it. We also never had any real model for what we do and how we do it, so I’m fairly convinced pretty much all the time that we always need to be in growth and in flux, ever-adapting as we learn and refine what we do.

You’ve been running the site for over ten years now, which is pretty amazing. How does it feel to look back on all that?

Thanks! To be perfectly honest, this is the longest consistent, uninterrupted thing outside my own body and mind I’ve ever had in my life. We’re going on thirteen years now, and I don’t even know what that is in Internet dog-years. I haven’t had any interpersonal relationships, even family ones, that were uninterrupted for that period of time, no other jobs that lasted that long, and I’ve yet to live in one place for this period of time. So, it’s pretty overwhelming.

But it’s also really cool: I (usually, because some days I am tired) love that this is my long-term love affair. It’s amazing to be getting to the point where people who came to Scarleteen in the early days as older teen or people in their early twenties are getting ready to — or already have! — send teens of their own to us. It’s very satisfying to hear from people years later who, in finding out we’re still here, tell us how much we helped them out and how much better they feel about their sexuality thanks to us. I grew up with an activist parent who schooled me soundly in the idea that I should be an activist if I felt strongly about it, but never expect to see any impact in my lifetime. To see an impact like we have has been an extraordinary and wonderful surprise.

What are some common questions you receive?

“Am I pregnant?” always reigns supreme. Other common questions are, and pretty much always have been:
- is a given body part “normal,” usually genitals or other body parts considered by a person or others as sexual
- am I straight/gay/lesbian/bisexual/queer/asexual
- how does a given kind of contraception or safer sex work, how do I get it
- is this, that or the other thing a symptom of an illness, infection or pregnancy
- how can I give my girlfriend or boyfriend am orgasm, or how can I have an orgasm
- is it okay for me to have sexual feelings at all
- when is the “right” time for me to have sex
- how do I negotiate what I want with a partner or how do I even find out what I want in the first place?

Over the last few years, we’ve also had an increase in questions about abusive/controlling relationships and about sexual abuse. Some of why is likely because we have a lot of visibility, these are things we talk about a lot, and a lot of our staff/volunteers are survivors. (On top of a strange majority of us being redheads.) But we also know the rates of intimate partner abuse and violence have been increasing in teens and young adults, which undoubtedly also plays a part. It also seems like we have had more and more users coming to us terrified and convinced they’re pregnant even when they’re clearly not, which seems to have a lot to do with what’s been going on on television of late with pregnancy and teen pregnancy. Yahoo answers is also big on my list of current offenders for misinformation (some awful bullying happens there, too) users come to us with.

How can our readers help you out?

One of the biggest ways we always need help is with funding. Unlike most other sex education initiatives, Scarleteen does not have any kind of government, institutional or foundational funding. We rely entirely on private donations in order to stay afloat. That’s pretty different from other organizations our size who do what we do and provide this level of service. We do things that way because the fact of the matter is that funding for sex education is very tough to get, especially when it’s not just about pregnancy or STIs, when it’s inclusive, when it’s holistic, when it’s feminist and when it’s for young people expressly. In order to get the big foundation bucks — something which is harder and harder for everyone to get, period — we’d have to be a very different enterprise than we are, and make compromises we don’t really want to make. There are some orgs out there doing good work within those boundaries already: doing the same things they’re doing would be redundant.

So, when we do fundraising drives, anything anyone can do to donate — even a little — and/or get the world out loud and proud makes such a difference. We are highly cost-efficient, but still have yet to have a year where our needs are truly met well. It doesn’t help that the majority of the people we serve would love to help financially support us, but few have their own incomes to do it with!

But it’s also a lot of work to run Scarleteen and to tend to as many users as we have, so when people can volunteer to actively help, that’s just as valuable. A vast majority of our content comes from my fingers and my mouth because so few people step up to guest-write for us. It’s always great when other writers can pitch in and do a piece for us, both because we always need more good content, but also because our readers benefit so much from a diversity of voices, rather than by only or primarily hearing my own.

Lastly, just letting young people in your life know we’re out there is a big deal. We don’t advertise, so word-of-mouth has always been how most of our users find us, and so many report they wish they’d found us earlier than they did.

Do you have any take-home messages?

Obviously, young people — any people — having accurate and non-anecdotal information about their bodies, about sexuality, about sexual health, about contraception and safer sex, the works, is so critically important. And obviously, not everyone has and can provide all of that information, because it’s just not everyone’s job, skillset or interest.

However, it’s very clear that what is just as critical is plain old kindness, compassion and support for ourselves and others with sexuality. That’s something everyone can both have and give. So, maybe you’re not someone who can tell others what all the stages of syphilis are or know what tends to impede sexual desire. Maybe you don’t know that epididymis is not something at the aquarium, or wouldn’t have the first idea about what muscles innervate the pelvis or where to refer someone for abortion funding, birth control or sex therapy.

But what EVERYONE can do is be a person who makes a difference when it comes to dismantling the fear and shame that surrounds pretty much everyone’s sexuality or sexual life. It’s so pervasive in our world, many people are deeply impacted by it and no one can completely avoid it. (If we think we have, we’re so kidding ourselves.) Young people are absolutely one of the groups who get whacked with a lot of shame and fear around sex, no matter what other groups they’re also part of. So, if and when a young person — or anyone — talks to us about their sexuality or sex life, or asks us about ours, we can all do our best to speak and listen mindfully, truthfully and with our hearts and minds open; to be supportive, accepting and flexible instead of judgmental, silencing or convinced we know How It Is just because we know how it is or was for us personally. I know it’s really hard for some folks to do that, but the more you do it, the easier it gets. Just doing that probably makes the most impact when it comes to people having a healthy personal sexuality and for all of us having a healthier global sexuality. We can help other people heal from sexual shame and fear that way while also healing ourselves. It’s so incredibly powerful and important.

In my job and with my organization, I try and do both, but not everyone finds services like Scarleteen, and even for those who do, we all need more than just one person or resource to give us that good stuff. Since most of our work is online, I also don’t think the emotional impact of having someone be supportive is as powerful online as it can be in person. Being able to have your sexuality supported and accepted by someone whose face you can see, and who can give you a hug if and when you need one, is a very big deal.

Jane Austen’s Fight Club

This is possibly the greatest YouTube video I have ever seen. It’s exactly what it sounds like: a faux trailer for a film about a fight club consisting of Jane Austen characters. There’s a transcript below the cut. You absolutely have my permission to repost the transcript, and please do, but I would appreciate a note and link of credit and if you’d let me know!

I’m so pleased to see people who aren’t white in a video like this, and every time I watch this anew I am more and more impressed by the high production values of a video obviously done on quite a small scale! They have to produce the film the “trailer” is for, don’t you think?

Transcript:

Fade from black into a shot panning over misty hills. Gentle piano music plays and we transition into a shot looking up into trees. And then down into yellow flowers as a bee flies around to the right.

To black and then two young ladies are walking, arm in arm, through a garden. Pink flowers are to the left of the shot, and, closer to us, yellow flowers are to the right. The woman on the left is in a white bonnet and a blue dress, holding a purple posy. The one on the right is wearing pink and a fascinator and has a smaller white posy.

Lizzie (which, as we will learn, is the name of the lady in pink, and who is smiling as she leans in head in a little towards her companion): I want you to hit me as hard as you can.
Fanny (the one in blue): What?

They stop and turn to each other. Close up of Lizzie, who has a hint of a smile about her features.

Lizzie: Hit me.

Fade to black and a voiceover: Wait. Allow me to begin earlier.

Back again. Then: Fanny and two women just behind her sides look very bored indeed.

VO: For all of us, life had become an endless surrender to propriety. [One of the ladies is sitting at her sewing.] A lady had her duties, [the pianist is shown, head resting on the piano, bored] her expected accomplishments, her polite affections [as Emma, as well will soon know her to be, meets a man passing in a corridor and they greet each other formally] and the primary objective to marry or, for all intents and purposes, perish [as the shot pans from a couple with eyes only for each other to a sad-looking young woman sitting on a couch with a fluffy white dog. The dog jumps down from her lap and her head sinks into her right hand].

Black, and back to the shot of the three women. Lizzie comes down the staircase.

Fanny in VO: She changed everything. [As we return to the opening conversation and Lizzie smiling hugely.]

[More contemporary music starts. Lizzie is making mock jabs at Fanny] Lizzie: Come on! Hit me before I lose my nerve! [Fanny slaps her lightly on the shoulder. Lizzie looks and her shoulder and then contemptuously at Fanny.] Really?

A group of young women, some in dresses and some in long period undergarments, are gathered around in a garden, cheering on a fight between Lizzie and a woman who wins.

VO: It was on the tip of everyone’s tongue…

[Close up of Emma, who raises her hand] Emma: Can I be next?

VO: … she just gave it a name.

[Shot quickly pans to Lizzie.] Lizzie: Ladies. [She slips off her dress to show frilly undergarments] Welcome to Fight Club. [She walks forward, out of shot.]

[Lizzie's VO begins as there are shots of one of them admiring a bruise on her cheek in the mirror and the sewer from before lowering her sewing from in front of her face, revealing a black eye. She smiles.] VO: The first rule of fight club is one never mentions Fight Club.

Lizzie, walking down a line of fighters standing outside: No corsets, no hatpins, and no crying. [She turns back to give a stern look to someone who looks aside and down, abashed.] If this is your first invitation to Fight Club… [change of shot] you must fight. [She smiles back at them.]

Another fight scene, with the onlookers cheering them on, in which Fanny wins over Lizzie. In another, one fighter swings from a tree to kick another in the chest. In another, a fighter cartwheels to standing and then has her nose twisted. In another, one fighter simply punches another in the face. With that shot, the voiceover starts again…

Fanny VO: After Fight Club, we were inclined to see the world differently. [A shot of one woman playing the piano with her skirts hitched up and a gash on her leg. Lizzie dances in a close and contemporary style with a young man.]

[Fanny is sitting at a table with a young woman who is cutting a cake.] Woman: Is that your blood?

[Fanny glances down at the rose on her dress, which is stained.] Fanny: Oh. Yes. Some of it. [Her companion looks horrified.]

Lizzie VO: You’re going to start a fight with a complete stranger.

Emma walks up to someone with whom she is playing croquet and slaps her lightly. A woman is reading a book as someone walks up behind her and pushes her into a hedge.

Lizzie VO: And you’re going to lose.

One of the fighters is dragged backwards over a lawn, to the right of the shot.

Fade to black as Fanny’s VO continues: We were no longer good society.

The music flares as the young women come down a staircase, the movement jumping forward a little with each surge of the music. Lizzie is at the front. Coloured splotches appear on the screen with the words, in white, ‘IN 1810′.

Lizzie punches someone and something sprays out of the latter’s mouth, shown in slow motion. Next, there is a shot of the women dancing in a very anachronistic style, some on a balcony, some in a front garden. Then a shot of a young woman pulling a young man in towards her. Again the coloured splotches, and the words ‘AND 2011′ appear.

Back to a fight as Lizzie gets punched, and a close-up as she thuds to earth. She leans up a little and smiles. Splotches and ‘LIZZIE’. A shot of Fanny smashing her companion’s head into the cake and ‘FANNY’. Emma punches someone in the face, and she is shown with her name, teeth bared. One of the Dashwoods flips the other over as they walk across a lawn, tossing her shoes down the lawn. ‘THE DASHWOODS’ appears amongst splotches with pictures of them both with their fists raised and bruised cheeks. Lizzie, in a faux leopard fur coat, backs away from Fanny, who has her back to us.

Lizzie: In the end you’ll thank me!

She puts on her sunglasses, gestures widely, sharply and defiantly, and turns to walk away.

Indoors, two women confer. One of the women: I suppose they think this will throw them into the path of eligible young men.

…as Fanny is pushed over, only to fall into a young man’s arms very stylishly.

Lizzie is pushed as she walks along with one of the women. Another fight shot. All the while, we have a voiceover from Fanny’s young man:

VO: You’re very clever, aren’t you? How’s that going for you? Being clever [...as we see him behind her, talking in her ear.]

A shot of Fanny pulling her companion out of the cake by the hair, and the two women who were conferring, one now laughing and one now drinking tea. A shot of Lizzie and two others looking serious. Lizzie turns her head to her right. Meanwhile, Fanny is looking back.

Fanny: Splendidly.

Lizzie, back in her coat, walks past the one of the conferring women, who is on the balcony holding a cup of tea. She knocks it out of her hand and far onto the lawn.

A splotchy title card appears, with ‘Jane Austen’s’ in a delicate font, followed by ‘Fight Club’ in strong capitals.

Lizzie, post teacup-knocking, throws a punch in the air and walks off before us. Black, and it’s over.

-

Here are the credits from the YouTube page:

We were no longer “good society.” janeaustensfightclub@gmail.com

Directed by Emily Janice Card & Keith Paugh
Written by Emily Janice Card
Director of Photography: Keith Paugh
Editing and Visual Effects: Jeff Dickson
Produced by Jeff Dickson, Emily Janice Card, Wendy Crompton
Stunt Choreography: Michelle Crompton
Sound Department: Leslie Paugh & Russell Lloyd
Makeup and Hair: Farrah Walker
Cast: Esther Rawlings, Emily Janice Card, Farrah Walker, Wendy Crompton, Michelle Crompton, Julie Hinton, Jessica Preece, Bonnie Anderson, Tiffany Jordan, Renee Miller, Kristen Hill, Kathryn Kulish, David Axelgard, Travis Morgan

© 2010 [RELATIVELY BADARSE PRODUCTIONS]

Tagged with: , ,