
Freedom of speech and practically all other types of human rights and civil liberties are under attack, yet again in Iran. Especially when it involves women campaigning for human rights and civil liberties for
both sexes. The Iranian government's persecution of human rights activists--especially feminists-- have been almost relentless for the past couple of months.The latest attack on basic human freedoms is on an Iranian feminist magazine called
Zanan, which has been ordered to shut down its publication by Iranian censors (Via
Feministing and the
Los Angeles Times Blogs, and photograph via
Zanan's website).
[...]On Tuesday word emerged that Iran's leading women's magazine has been ordered to close.
Iranian censors shuttered Zanan Magazine, a reform-minded feminist magazine active in promoting women's rights for the last 16 years. Authorities revoked its license and folks in Tehran say there's no hope for appeal.
Managing director Shahla Sherkat was once a hardline supporter of the Iranian government but became disillusioned after the Iran-Iraq war. Zanan managed to survive previous crackdowns by cautiously avoiding general politics and focusing on women's issues.
But that didn't work, apparently.
According to preliminary reports it was banned for portraying a negative image of women in Iran, but no official word has emerged yet.
The Iranian Journalists Association condemned the closeure. In the past two years, 40 periodicals including Zanan have been banned across the country by the Press Supervision Board, which is controlled by hardliners.[...]
Fuck the Iranian government and any other
*government on this shit-hole of a planet that violates human rights and civil liberties. These violations of basic human freedoms must come to an end! (
*That includes Bush 's and Cheney's quasi-
Junta, that has been eroding Americans' rights and liberties, lying to the American people and the international community with such arrogant diligence and a sociopathic style that would put Orwell's
Big Brother to shame, shitting all over the international community, bastardizing our country's standing in the world, and illegally invading a sovereign nation--although a sovereign nation ruled by a genocidal, madman dictator--and throwing said country into chaos, and costing both the U.S. and the Iraqi people thousands upon thousands of lives, since January 20, 2001
.)
posted 8:39 pm at Pseudo-Adrienne's Liberal-Feminist Bias
(Via the BBC)
More than 1,600 people, including Holocaust survivors, attended the service at the Philharmonic Hall.
The service marked the 1945 liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp but victims of other atrocities were also remembered.
Leaders of several faiths listened to personal testimony and called for an end to genocide throughout the world.
Dr Rowan Williams and Sir Jonathan Sacks signed a Pledge Against Genocide in the form of a large mural.
'Mass graves'
The ceremony included personal testimony from survivors and relatives, poetry, music and speeches.
Among the speakers was the Reverend Leslie Hardman, who helped to liberate the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp as a British solider.
Kay Fyne, from Liverpool, spoke of her memories of being taken to the camp as a child.
The Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra and a 100-strong community choir performed for the event which explored the Jewish experience of the Holocaust with the theme, Imagine: Remember, Reflect, React.[...]
'Never forget'
The Muslim Council of Britain ended its boycott of the event. It had wanted more recognition of atrocities in other parts of the world, such as Bosnia and Chechnya.
Communities and Local Government Secretary Hazel Blears introduced a video-message from Prime Minister Gordon Brown in which he urged people to "never forget" the Holocaust.
The service ended with the performers trooped out of the hall singing We're All in the World Together, holding candles as they filed out.
Christine Shaw, of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust, said the event aimed to "reflect on the lessons society can learn from the Holocaust and other genocides in an effort to tackle the intolerance and prejudice that still exists in the UK today".
Karen Pollock, of the Holocaust Educational Trust, told BBC Radio Five Live it was important to make what had happened in the past relevant to today.
"The fact is that racism still exists, that genocide is taking place in Darfur, and genocide has happened since the Holocaust, for instance Cambodia [and] Rwanda.[...]
And
here's a brutally honest and sobering quote from British actor *Jason Isaacs who led the memorial. (*Lucius Malfoy in Harry Potter, Mike Caffee in Showtime's Brotherhood, the villainous red-coat Colonel Tavington in The Patriot, he played the British ambassador in BBC-America's The State Within)
[...]I’m not a big fan of gathering people together in a room to make them feel bad about something. But, in these scary and revisionist times, I do think it’s important to be reminded of what we’re capable of as human beings, and also it’s vital to keep track of what governments are doing, supposedly in our names. “Look, remind, reflect and react” is a pretty good way of approaching any situation, not just one as overwhelming as the Holocaust.
That's for damn sure.
Never forget and
never allow fascism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, any form of bigotry, persecution, or discrimination to flourish again on this planet. But unfortunately injustice, bigotry, discrimination,
Orwellian/Manichaean-paranoid governments (::cough:: Bush Administration! ::cough:: And several others around the globe), and even genocide still thrive in this world, because good people stand by and do nothing.
posted 5:29 pm at Pseudo-Adrienne's Liberal-Feminist Bias
Eufrosina Cruz of a
Zapotec Village in Santa Maria Quiegolani, Mexico (Via
Feministing and
MSNBC.com).
SANTA MARIA QUIEGOLANI, Mexico - Women in this Indian village high in the pine-clad mountains of Oaxaca rise each morning at 4 a.m. to gather firewood, grind corn, prepare the day’s food, care for the children and clean the house.
But they aren’t allowed to vote in local elections, because — the men say — they don’t do enough work.
It was here, in a village that has struggled for centuries to preserve its Zapotec traditions, that Eufrosina Cruz, 27, decided to become the first woman to run for mayor — despite the fact that women aren’t allowed to attend town assemblies, much less run for office.
The all-male town board tore up ballots cast in her favor in the Nov. 4 election, arguing that as a woman, she wasn’t a “citizen” of the town. “That is the custom here, that only the citizens vote, not the women,” said Valeriano Lopez, the town’s deputy mayor.
Rather than give up, Cruz has launched the first serious, national-level challenge to traditional Indian forms of government, known as “use and customs,” which were given full legal status in Mexico six years ago in response to Indian rights movements sweeping across Latin America.
“For me, it’s more like ‘abuse and customs,”’ Cruz said as she submitted her complaint in December to the National Human Rights Commission. “I am demanding that we, the women of the mountains, have the right to decide our lives, to vote and run for office, because the constitution says we have these rights.”
Lopez acknowledged that votes for Cruz were nullified, but claims they added up to only 8 ballots of about 100 cast in this largely unpaved village of about 1,500 people.
Cruz says she was winning — and wants the election to be annulled and held again, this time with women voting.
Men over 60 also can't vote
But the male leaders are refusing to budge. “We live differently here, senor, than people in the city. Here, women are dedicated to their homes, and men work the fields,” Apolonio Mendoza, the secretary of the all-male town council, told a visiting reporter.
Cruz has received some support from older men, who by village law lose their political rights when they turn 60. Some younger men also say the system must change and give women more rights.
At a recent meeting of several dozen Cruz supporters, most of them voteless, women in traditional gray shawls recalled being turned down for government aid programs because they weren’t accompanied by a man.
Martina Cruz Moreno, 19, said that when her widowed mother sought government-provided building materials to improve her dirt-floor, tin-roofed wooden home, village authorities told her, “Go get yourself a husband.”
As a woman, Eufrosina Cruz is not only barred from being mayor, but from participating in the “community labor” that qualifies male villagers as “citizens.” Those tasks include repairing roads, herding cattle, cleaning streets and raising crops.
“I’d like to see the men here make tortillas, just for one day, and then tell me that’s not work,” said Cruz, describing the hours-long process of cleaning, soaking, cooking and milling the corn, shaping the flour into flat disks, and collecting the firewood to heat the clay and brick hearths on which most women cook.
During all-important village festivals, women are expected to cook for all the male guests. But instead of joining them at the table, Cruz says, they are relegated to straw mats on the floor. Clothes are washed by hand, and while most homes have some form of running water, it’s often only a single spigot.[...]
She traveled to the nearest city to enroll in school, live with relatives and support herself through odd jobs, eventually graduating from college with a degree in accounting.
She is single, and in a village culture where most women wear skirts, she wears pants. Because her village has no formal jobs for women, she works as a school director in a nearby town, and returns to Quiegolani most weekends. That, authorities say, disqualified her from running for mayor because she wasn’t a full-time resident. But the man who won the race also works outside the town, and there are questions about how much time he actually spends here.
Cruz views the residency issue as a pretext, noting that authorities have also banned female candidates and anybody with a college degree from running. She said she has followed the use and custom rules as much as she was allowed to, carefully fulfilling lower-level duties that function as a means of testing people’s devotion to their village. For four years, she “carried the Virgin” in a religious procession through the town, and has helped fund or organize other festivities.[...]
“I am not asking anything for myself. I am asking on behalf of Indian women, so that never again will the laws allow political segregation,” Cruz wrote to the commissioners, who may take months to investigate the case, and who could recommend that state authorities protect women’s rights to vote or hold office. She says she’ll go higher, to federal electoral authorities, if necessary.
Change tied to Zapatista rebellion
In Mexico, many local governance rules date to before the Spanish conquest and weren’t given national legal recognition until a 2001 Indian rights reform was enacted in the wake of the Zapatista rebel uprising in Chiapas.
The law states that Indian townships may “apply their own normative systems ... as long as they obey the general principles of the Constitution and respect the rights of individuals, human rights, and particularly the dignity and well-being of women.”
Despite this specific protection, about a fourth of the Indian villages operating under the law don’t let women vote, putting human rights groups in a dilemma: Most actively supported recognition for Indian governance systems, and few have therefore taken up the women’s cause.
Cruz now travels alone from one government office to another, always carrying an armful of calla lilies. “This flower grows a lot in the village. Even though we don’t water or care for it much, it flowers,” she explained. “It is a symbol for us Indian women.”[...]
Cruz says she isn’t against all customs in her village. She prefers its bipartisanship to political party rivalry because it encourages close-knit Indian communities to stick together and underpins their survival.[...]
posted 5:17 pm at Pseudo-Adrienne's Liberal-Feminist Bias
Oxfam International calls for an end to Israel's blockade to the Gaza Strip.MADRE supports Ms. Magazine's decision to decline an ad from the neoconservative American Jewish Congress, featuring "prominent" Israeli women.Via IPAS, Veronica Cruz Sanchez, founder of
Las Libres and a human-rights- and reproductive-justice-activist, was in North Carolina last Thursday to share her story about her work and her organization.
Via International Planned Parenthood, contraceptive pills have helped prevent ovarian cancer deaths in the United Kingdom,
South African activists want more action to be taken in order to prevent mother-to-child HIV/AIDS transmission, and
unfortunately amidst the violent political turmoil in Kenya, gang-rapes are on the rise.Via We-Change: Change for Equality, the pro-Iranian-women's-rights website,
another Iranian-women's-rights activist has been summoned by Iranian authorities. Just more harassment and persecution of women's-rights-, feminist, and overall human-rights activists in Iran.
Via Women Living Under Muslim Laws,
Iran is once again cracking down on "immodest" women's clothing (bad and discriminatory) , evaluating the "general situation" for Afghan women, and
widow's rights in Ghana. UNIFEM recently announced its new campaign to end violence against women. Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan: the sad but true reality for Afghan women,
"a woman's worth is only half of a man's." Women's eNews:
female-guides in Nepal "gain ground" and their
Cheers&Jeers of the week.
Pambazuka News: "Rapists roam the streets" in the Democratic Republic of Congo,
"Madagascar: Women in Parliament," and
"Malawi: Baseline report on school-related gender-based violence."And
help save Darfur.
posted 10:40 am at Pseudo-Adrienne's Liberal-Feminist Bias
(Via CNN) And so does any other American who has grown beyond tired and impatient with this
Orwellian, belligerent, intellectually-defective, petulant, cowboy president and his Nixonesque administration. Of course their virulent phobia of being held accountable to the U.S Constitution, Congress, human rights, and the American people is painfully showing yet again, as the boy-king and his cronies have demanded--in their usual whiny, "
I'm entitled to all of the power and privilege, but none of the responsibility!"-manner-- the courts to
not get involved. And the BushCo is using their
*signature scare-tactic in the hopes of frightening off any criminal investigation of their operations (
*i.e., "
if you attempt to hold us accountable and make the White House beholden to the U.S. Constitution, Congress, human rights, and the American people then you're unpatriotic, a commie-pinko anti-American, an al-Qaeda sympathizer, anti-military, and terrorists will blow up the world! Boogidey-boogidey-boo!"). Fuckin' immature quasi-fascists! And yet all the while, the Congressional Democrats have failed in just about all of their campaign promises, especially with Pelosi and Reid being the biggest cowards in taking impeachment hearings of Bush and Cheney off of the table, and they haven't really done any productive shit in order to bring our troops home. Anyways, the article....
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal judge said Thursday that CIA interrogation videotapes may have been relevant to his court case, and he gave the Bush administration three weeks to explain why they were destroyed in 2005 and say whether other evidence was destroyed.
Several judges are considering wading into the dispute over the videos.
But U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts was the first to order the administration to provide a written report on the matter.
The decision is a legal setback for the Bush administration, which has urged courts not to get involved.
The tapes showed harsh interrogation tactics used by CIA officers questioning al Qaeda suspects Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri in 2002.
The Justice Department and Congress are investigating the destruction of the tapes.
When they were destroyed, the government was under various court orders to retain evidence relevant to terrorism suspects at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. After it became public in December that the tapes had been destroyed, lawyers for several detainees went to court demanding to know more.[...]
The Justice Department has warned that a judicial inquiry could jeopardize the criminal investigation. U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy, the first judge to consider the question, held a public hearing before agreeing not to hear evidence in the case.
Earlier this month, a federal judge in New York said destroying the tapes appeared to have violated his order in a case involving the American Civil Liberties Union. But U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein has not yet said how he will rule.[...]
David Remes, an attorney in a similar case who unsuccessfully sought information about the videotapes, praised the ruling.
"It was only a matter of time before a court ordered the government to account for its handling -- or mishandling -- of evidence in these cases," Remes said.
posted 7:01 pm at Pseudo-Adrienne's Liberal-Feminist Bias