Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Posts by Repo Repro

Blogging for RJ from Michigan, Vermont, Massachusetts, and D.C.!

LSRJ is thrilled to introduce four passionate and thoughtful resident bloggers for the 2010-2011 school year. They will be sharing their insights, opinions, and experiences as RJ advocates on law school campuses across the country. Post questions, challenge them and yourself, and join the conversation! They are:

Lucy Panza - Georgetown University Law Center

Lucy is a 3L at Georgetown. Originally from Argentina, she was raised in Maryland and has loved politics and dogs from a young age. She is co-president of her LSRJ chapter this year, which offers the ever-exciting opportunity to grapple with a Catholic university over free-speech issues, coverage of reproductive health benefits in the student insurance plan, and heading up an unfunded, unsponsored student organization. Lucy is excited to bring a Latina perspective to RepoRepro — and she’s excited to be nearing the end of law school!

Lara Shkordoff - Northeastern University School of Law

Lara is a 2L at Northeastern. She hails from Toronto, Canada and has led many different lives in her journey from Canada-land to Beantown to LSRJ resident blogger. She was a waitress at an Irish pub; an almost-Masters student in Longdon; a receptionist at a cosmetic surgery clinic; and co-founder of an education advocacy organization that fights to end sexism, racism, classism, and homophobia in Ontario high schools. Lara is particularly fond of watching New York Undercover marathons and listening to cheesy early 90’s R&B (she cites TLC, Salt N Pepa, and Boyz II Men as particular favorites). She is not fond of questionnaires, speaking in third person, or wearing sunglasses in the club. Lara is excited to blog about RJ for many reasons, one being that since taking up residence south of the Canadian border, her uterus and ovaries have felt a little less legally protected.

Sara Taylor - University of Michigan Law School

Sara is a 3L at Michigan and a proud LSRJ intern alumnus! She loves to bake and makes a life-altering ginger scone. Sara had a rich professional life before the oppressive nature of law school took over, from bartending to biology, most of which required a sense of humor and sometimes an anal probe. Her goal in life is to help women and girls feel safe and supported no matter where they’ve been or where they’re headed. She knows she is going to love being a resident blogger because she can finally stop having conversations with herself.

Jess Wilkerson - Vermont Law School

Jess is a 3L at Vermont. As a strong believer in the equal distribution of power among all peoples, she is interested in asking critical questions about the state of access to reproductive information and health globally. At VLS, she actively seeks to engage the entire community in discussion about how these issues play out for each individual personally and how future clients may be affected as well. She is excited to be bringing this conversation to the greater online community! When she has time, she loves to put her off-road driving certification to use by getting outside!

If you are interested in guest blogging for or cross-posting on RepoRepro, email reporepro at lsrj dot org.

My Date with Mr. Rights, My Weekend with Mrs. Rights Now!

I got distracted by the Washington Monument.  I mean, who wouldn’t?  I took a picture with my cell phone and captioned it “Pshhh, men.  Typical.”  I found a police officer and asked him, “Which way to the National Archives?”  He directed me back from whence I’d been walking.  I mean, there were arrows pointing to the White House, there were arrows pointing to the National Aquarium, the Ronald Reagan Building, the Smithsonian, not a single one pointing to the National Archives.  So, I walked back.  Small pretzel detour, eyeballed the Internal Revenue Service, thunk some good thoughts to Ms Kagan at the DoJ, and crossed 9th and Constitution Ave wondering how in the world it’s taken me this long to do so.

Finally, I was there.  It was a little late in the day, so the line was fairly heinous but, without the glaring midday sun, we stalwart many couldn’t benefit from queue attrition through overheated impatience.  And so we all waited, treated to a few low-flying helicopters and entertained by an audio tour available via recorded phone message.  I learned all about the exterior of the building.

Finally, I was in.  I darted politely to the rotunda, gave a slight nod to the Magna Carta, and listened to a very funny diatribe by one of the security guards about the movie National Treasure (FYI - no secret passages.  Suuuuurrrre.).  Then, the velvet rope was lifted.

 

Finally, I saw it.  And I whispered - without humor or hesitation - you’re the reason I’m here. (more…)

A Growing Concern: How to Combat Aloof Law School Administrations

Throughout the Leadership Institute, I’ve heard students express concerns about how tone deaf their administrations seem to be when it comes to the changes they advocate for on campus.  As I and my fellow chapter board member Grace made very clear, our school (Georgetown) is pretty abysmal when it comes to respective students’ reproductive health (principally by denying us access to contraception while offering it to faculty and staff).  Despite our advocacy efforts (and support from the student body), the administration doesn’t want to budge.  So I was simultaneously heartened and dismayed to hear that other LSRJ members are experiencing similar rejection from their administrations.  Heartened because it always feels better to suffer together rather than alone, and dismayed because the more widespread the reproductive oppression, the more obvious it becomes that our message has yet to be heard by all.

Forsaking the pessimist label, my new friends and I had multiple conversations about making our voices heard on campus.  I think one of the principle themes to come out of our discussions was this:  apart from the financial viability that we provide to our law schools by paying tuition, there are at least three other reasons our administrations should be taking us seriously.  (more…)

Having the Courage to Find Your Own Way

 

No one disputes that it is risky to take a non-traditional career path, especially when pursuing a law degree.  When you add reproductive justice issues into the equation, with all of the false assumptions that come from outside of the movement, the path becomes that much more challenging.  In the closing plenary session of the LSRJ Leadership Institute this afternoon, Malika Saada Saar of the Rebecca Project for Human Rights boldly shared that going through law school on her alternative path challenged everything that she knew about herself.

 

As someone who never pictured herself in law school and finds herself continually bucking the recommended path for success on the road to a JD and beyond, it was reassuring for me to hear.  Even this incredibly successful, powerful and inspiring woman had doubts about herself while in school.  The truth is that the biggest favor a person who is passionate about human rights issues can do for herself is giver herself permission to trust in her ability to make decisions.  Law Review and firm work do not have to be included.  Or they can be.  Good grades can open doors but so can volunteer work and hands-on experience.  There are many options open to each of us and each of those options can play a significant role in the reproductive justice movement.  Once we get ourselves through the doors of the law school, we can feel comfortable that we have gotten over the main hurdle that demands we fit into a certain mold.  From there, the challenge becomes finding our purpose and our place and moving boldly forward. (more…)

Leadership Institute Day 1: Getting Inspired and Getting Organized

 

Inspiring.  Motivating.  Invigorating.  These are all words that can be used to describe the vibe at Day 1 of the 2010 Leadership Institute.  With a national cast of law students from a variety of backgrounds but with a common interest, the enthusiasm for reproductive justice was palpable.  Though many of us may not have been ready to be back in the law school environment (summer’s not over yet!), the atmosphere at George Washington University School of Law was full of promise, excitement, and opportunity.

 

After an exciting round of icebreaking Bingo to get a chance to know more about the other student leaders in the room, LSRJ National Office staff members Mariko Miki and Jill Adams set a great tone for the day with an overview of LSRJ and a primer of the fundamental elements of reproductive justice. Both sessions provided attendees with a common framework to engage in the variety of afternoon sessions.  During lunch, several caucuses on issues such as fundraising, new chapters, law students of color, and ideologically or religiously conservative campuses allowed members to dig deep into specific issues facing their chapters and collaborate on creative solutions.  Attendees were presented with opportunities to improve their leadership skills and discover tools to engage and recruit students on their campus through workshops on coalition building, effective messaging, and blogging techniques. (more…)

Why Doesn’t Justice Just Happen?

The theme of this year’s Law Students for Reproductive Justice Leadership Institute is “Justice Doesn’t Just Happen.” When I first heard the theme, I was enthusiastic because it reminded me that I am becoming educated for a worthwhile purpose that is larger than myself. I immediately knew that I would arrive in Washington, D.C. and find people that are energized, creative and passionate about making a positive difference in the world.  I could not wait to re-connect with the larger community of reproductive justice advocates.

Then I wondered, why doesn’t justice just happen?  Why is it that when we make laws, it is hard to remember that different people will be impacted differently?  Why is it that some people work to purposefully restrict access to resources and rights for others?  Why do we need to organize around a large variety of human rights issues?  Why will many of us be able to make careers around protecting people’s rights to reproductive health, access and freedom?

Personally, I occasionally get distracted from the immediate work by larger questions of humanity.  For instance, how did we arrive at the year 2010 without a healthy respect for each other?  How are we still harboring the fear that there is just not enough for everyone and so we better just grab:  grab power, grab resources, grab money?  But the truth is, people have made progress in learning about and even appreciating one another in the last few hundred years.  The important part is that I end the day with hope that we can continue to move forward and that I can make a difference, especially when I am given so many tools by LSRJ along my journey.

Jessica Wilkerson

Back to Reality: Why Abstinence-Only Education Needs an Upgrade

In a scene from the most recent Twilight movie, Bella tries to convince Edward that she wants him and wants to take the next step in their relationship by having sex.  While Edward makes it clear that he definitely wants her back, he tells her that in his time, there would be a whole process before any of this could take place.  He would have wooed her, they’d hold hands, he’d get permission from her father to marry her, they’d get married, then they’d do the deed.  Bella informs him that it’s now her day in age, and that’s definitely not the way it works.  Who knew that Twilight would have such a brilliant metaphor for why abstinence-only education doesn’t work?

The problem with abstinence-only education is not so much that it wants teenagers to prolong sexual activity until they are married, but more that it’s completely out of touch with today’s modern teenager.  Suporters of ab-only education seem to believe that sex should only occur during marriage, and anything outside of that concept is morally wrong.  They suggest that comprehensive sex education that teaches students about condoms and other forms of contraception is what causes teenagers to engage in sexual behavior.  As if saying, well if kids don’t learn about condoms and contraception from their sex-ed teacher at school, then they will magically never be curious about sex or have any idea what it is.  Apparently, they’ve never turned on their TV.

The simple truth  is, teenagers are exposed to sex on a regular basis, whether their parents want to accept it or not.  It’s on TV.  It’s in music videos and song lyrics.  It’s in magazines and print ads for their favorite clothing store.  And on that little thing called the internet.  Sex is a part of our society and our culture, plain and simple.  Sexuality is part of the human condition.  And it’s complicated. (more…)

Tagged with: , ,

Movie Review: The Business of Being Born

Film actress and television host Ricki Lake, twice pregnant (in real life and also in the movie Mrs. Winterbourne, alongside his royal hotness, Brendan Fraser), brings one of her birth experiences to the silver screen in The Business of Being Born.  Upset with the hospital birth experience the first time, Ms. Lake opts for a home birth the second time (Go Ricki! Go Ricki!  Go Ricki!).  Her second son, Owen Sussman (now 9 years old), greets the world in gooey glory about 45 minutes into the movie, so you know it’s good.  The only thing that might have made it better is, as is the case for all movies, Brendan Fraser.

Somewhere between Frontline and Fahrenheit 911, this documentary presents a fact-based albeit slightly sanctimonious (and one-sided) examination of midwifery (mid-whiff-er-ee) and birthing options in America.  The statistics are frequently sobering – the one that really stuck with me was that, in 1900, 95% of all U.S. births took place at home, which was down to 50% by 1938 and <1% by 1955 (where it is today).  The movie partially credits hippy communes with the “rebirth” of midwifery in the U.S., noting necessity and the empowerment aspects of home birth.  (more…)

An Afternoon with a Reproductive Health Lobbyist

I had the wonderful privilege of spending last Thursday, July 1, 2010, in the California Capitol with a prominent reproductive health lobbyist.   After arriving in Sacramento via the beautifully scenic Amtrak train ride, we drove downtown near the Capitol where it was lunchtime and all the politicos were chatting, lunching and doing their politics thing.  While most people have heard of “lobbyists” or “lobbying,” what goes into the day to day work of this profession is something that many don’t know about.  I was able to experience even a few hours of that and it is a demanding profession.  Lobbying is a form of advocacy with the intention of influencing decisions made by legislators.  It is advocating on behalf of a client, whether it be an individual, organization or corporation.  The term “lobbying” comes from the fact that lobbyists used to stand in the areas, or “lobbies,” outside the House or Senate chambers in order to chat with legislators as they come to or from chambers or to await legislative decisions. (more…)

Tagged with: ,

Expert Advice: An Update on Emergency Contraception

Last week, I had the opportunity to participate in a really interesting webinar about Emergency Contraception with Dr. James Trussell, a leading researcher in contraceptive efficacy and contraceptive methods.  The webinar was focused on updates on research about emergency contraception and some of its reasons for failure, as well as information about the newest EC option, Ella, which was recently approved by an advisory committee to the FDA.   Much of the information presented related to the participants of the studies that were done to calculate the effectiveness of EC. 

One of the most interesting aspects of the presentation was actually the question and answer period at the end of the presentation.  The main audience of this webinar turned out to be health care providers and medical professionals who counseled women about emergency contraception options across the country and even Canada.  The questions that they asked Dr. Trussell reminded me that there are so many unique situations that people can find themselves in.  Some expressed concern about their patient’s ability to access medication that is not available over-the-counter in rural areas, being able to afford emergency contraception without insurance, and whether using emergency contraception could interfere with breast-feeding.  It was great to hear so many people who would be able to provide them with accurate information in a non-judgmental setting.  Since the announcement of the FDA’s consideration of Ella, the amount of misinformation represented on blogs, websites and news reports reminds me how important it is to have accurate, fact-based information from professionals readily available.  It hopeful to know that many of the people giving advice and counsel to young women have taken the time to educate themselves on the facts of emergency contraception from one of the leading experts in the field.

Jeryl Hayes