Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Share this fundraiser with friends online using ChipIn!

Support Feminist Bloggers!

Feminist Blogs depends on contributions from readers like you to stay running. We're doing a fundraising drive for the months of February and March.

Donations provide for the costs of running feministblogs.org and provide direct financial support to active Feminist Blogs contributors. See the donation page for more details.


Posts by tiffany

I guess it’s no secret

I’ve given up blogging here. Too much time. Too many people sending their negativity. Too much work being somewhat of a “blogebrity.”

Quite frankly, I’ve been worn out by the entire experience, and haven’t been paying much attention to politics and culture much lately anyway. I’ve got other things going on that, frankly, are far more important to me than being an armchair activist and a target for crazy people (like the anti-abortionist who sent mail to my house — yes I’m talking to you “L. Word” supposedly of 3208 Curtis Drive #304 Temple Hills, MD 20748. And no, I didn’t bother reading it).

Blogging about feminism and politics just became progressively less fun for me. And, quite frankly, I’m over it.

Recommended listening

The Color of Wealth: Story Behind the US Racial Wealth Divide [MP3 file]

An utterly fascinating look at how public policy and racism combined to create a tremendous wealth gap in the United States. How big? We’re talking $0.10 on every dollar of wealth owned by white people.

Also recommended: The Hidden Cost of Being African American: How Wealth Perpetuates Inequality

Tell the New York Post to stop its transphobia

Jack of AngryBrownButch is waging a letter-writing campaign against the New York Post and its reporting of transgender cases. Read more here and get involved.

Turning off comments from now through early January

I (and hopefully you too) will be busy with family, holiday and travel stuff over the next week or so. To my mind, the only thing more rude and pathetic than being on a computer when you should be spending time with your friends and family is being on a computer checking blog comments and cleaning up blog spam when you should be spending time with your friends and family.

So I’m shutting down comments and pings on all current posts.

Happy Last Day of Hannukah (if that’s what you celebrate)! Have a Merry Christmas (if that’s what you celebrate)! Happy Kwanzaa (if you celebrate it)! And a have a healthy and prosperous New Year.

See you in 2007.

In or Out? Slurs and such

In the recent article Anti-Gay Slurs: The Latest in Hilarity, Charles Isherwood asks:

In “The Little Dog Laughed,” Douglas Carter Beane’s Hollywood satire at the Cort Theater … Little notice has been taken of Mr. Beane’s comic exploitation of what is, in other contexts, called hate speech. But he seems to be aware that he is treading on tender turf: how else to explain the agent’s opening announcement that she’s a lesbian? Her sexuality then disappears until a passing reference in the last scene. But it’s enough to inoculate her (and perhaps him) against accusations of homophobia: she’s on the team, so she’s allowed, and we’re allowed to chuckle. (For the record, Mr. Beane is an openly gay man.)

The play raises a question that has been brought to the forefront of the cultural chatter recently in another context: Who is and is not allowed to use — and to laugh at or milk laughs from — derisive names for minorities?

The article goes on to ask “Is it all about context?” When, if ever, is it okay to use a slur? And when does it cross the line into something more (for better or worse)? Does humor make slurs okay or tolerable? And if it isn’t funny, does it become more offensive?

I’ll let you all answer in the comments.

Study: Black women are single because of white-washed bridal magazines

From the abstract for Always a Bridesmaid and Never a Bride: Portrayals of Women of Color as Brides in Bridal Magazines:

… [T]he number of African American married couples is only half the number of married Whites. And, an even more alarming statistic is the increase in the number of both African American men and women who have never been married … The problem here may be explained in large part to favoritism as displayed in the media and in ads. Perhaps the presence of Caucasian women as brides has sent an unintended message to African American women and that message is: The only qualified woman for marriage is a White woman.

Erm, except that:

  1. Bridal advertisements are almost exclusively aimed at women
  2. Men do most of the proposing
  3. Men generally don’t read bridal magazines and therefore aren’t absorbing that imagery

Besides, don’t most women read bridal magazines after they have accepted a proposal and shown a willingness to get married? It seems awfully implausible, then, that there’s an epidemic of black women becoming engaged, and then not getting married — at a rate of almost 60% — because we’re not featured as brides in bridal magazines.

So what’s really going on?

Black women aren’t getting married for one, very simple, very logical reason that doesn’t have sh*t to do with bridal magazines: there aren’t any men in proximity to say ‘Yes’ to.

In many, if not most black neighborhoods, the numbers of marriage-worthy black men — and by that I mean: alive, legally employed, disease-free, addiction-free, never been to jail, not crazy or abusive and actually want to get married — are low.

If you have the nerve to also want “child free,” “reasonably fine” and “compatible with me,” giiiirl, just give up and invest in a B.O.B. Physical and cultural racial isolation means there’s also no opportunity to marry someone of another race or ethnicity.

If no one is asking — or as importantly, you don’t want to say yes to the one that did — there’s a good chance you won’t get married even if every bridal magazine featured Alek Wek on the cover.

• • •

That said: I think advertisers and bridal magazines that don’t feature women of color are missing out on a market opportunity. Check the demographics, man: a full 25% of the United States is of color. That percentage increases among younger people (who will probably get married some day).

Those of us who have the means are quite keen on seeing people who look like us in the media we consume. Fiercely loyal to those brands, too. So while I disagree about effects of the conclusions these researchers draw, I completely agree with the notion that advertisers and magazine publishers could and should feature models of color.

New Jersey approves civil unions for gays

Read about it on Reuters.com

I personally think marriages are a type of civil union, and that we should use ‘civil union’ as a term for all legally-recognized relationships. Still it’s nice to see that gay couples will at least have a measure of protection in the eyes of the law without having to go through legal hoops to secure them.

Links for 2006-12-12

The NY Times fantasizes about 2008

The Pattern May Change, if … looks at the possibility of Barack Obama and/or Hillary Clinton running for the presidency:

But as Barack Obama, the senator from Illinois whose father is from Kenya, spends this weekend exploring a presidential bid in New Hampshire, and Hillary Rodham Clinton, the first woman to represent New York in the Senate, calls potential supporters in Iowa, the question remains: are Americans prepared to elect an African-American or a woman as president?

Or, to look at it from the view of Democrats hungry for victory in 2008, is the nation more likely to vote for a woman or an African-American for president?

I think the question is missing a noun and an adjective. Do me a favor, y’all, and stick ‘man’ after African-American and ‘white’ in front of woman since we know that all African Americans are not men and all women are not white.

But let’s discuss it here. Are you looking forward to a run from the other Clinton? Is the thought of Obama exiciting enough to make you slap yo’ mama? Is there anyone you’d rather see (what if Al Gore made a comeback)? Who do you think would win the primary? And the big question: do you think race or gender is the bigger barrier in American politics?

Should race be changeable?

New York City’s proposal to allow legal gender reclassification got me to thinking about identity: how much is nature, how much is nurture, and how much is based on how others react to your phenotype (which I guess is another form of nurture, but roll with it)?

It presents an interesting question about self-definition, namely this one: Should race in the U.S. be self-defined and changeable?*

And the follow-up questions:

  1. What, if any, standards should have to be met to allow this switch?
  2. Would you change your race?
    1. If so, from what to what? Or what would you call your race?
    2. Why or why not?
  3. What would you be most concerned about in a society with malleable racial categories and racial self-definition?

I’m not 100% clear on the current status of legal definitions of race, although there are federally-defined categories for race and ethnicity.

To my knowledge, race is self-reported when it comes to the census. However, there are defined categories from which to choose. Different jurisdictions also record race differently — South Carolina, for example, lists race your driver’s license. New York does not. Some municipalities record race on your birth certificate. Others, do not. To actually change your race, however, requires a whole lot of court-wrangling, if it happens at all.

Blackness, however, has always had a rigid legal definition — The One-Drop Rule — where other racial groups did not.

Related: