Environment archives

The Story of Stuff

Cross-posted at AngryBrownButch.

Every morning I seem to find some distraction on the Internet that leads to me running out the door far later than I should have left or starting my work day woefully off schedule. Usually the distraction is something like Scramble on Facebook, but this morning’s distraction was enriching and enlightening enough that I don’t feel so bad about running late (and running even later in order to share it with you folks.) A friend of mine (thanks, Eli!) linked to The Story of Stuff, a short documentary on the insidious processes that go into consumption as we know it. The video has been online since December 2007 and has apparently had 2 million viewers so I risk recommending it to a bunch of folks who’ve already seen it, but I hadn’t and I thought it important to share.

Annie Leonard, a scholar who has done many years of research on consumerism, development, sustainability, and environmental health, guides us through the linear process that drives the material economy - extraction, production, distribution, consumption, and disposal - exposing the many moments in the process that are often left out of the big picture but which are often most telling of the damage occurs within each of these steps. I’ve seen and read many things about consumption and its effects on our world, but this movie broke things down in a clearer, more complete and more urgent way than I’ve seen before. Leonard does a good job of bringing to light the environmental, health, labor, globalization and other social justice problems inherent to the system of consumption.

Some of the facts that Leonard cites are truly frightening. One fact that I’d never heard before and found particularly shocking: when talking about the countless toxic chemicals used in production and therefore brought into our homes and our bodies, Leonard says:

Do you know what is the food at the top of the food chain with the highest levels of many toxic contaminants? Human breast milk. That means that we’ve reached a point where the smallest members of our societies - our babies - are getting the highest lifetime dose of toxic chemicals from breast feeding from their mothers. Is that not an incredible violation?

I appreciated that Leonard called this a “violation,” because that’s precisely what it is. We have allowed corporations and complicit governments to violate our very bodies, as well as our environment and countless cultures and communities, simply in order to give us cheaper, more consumable products.* Leonard thankfully goes on to stress that “breast feeding is still best,” but as someone who plans to probably give birth and subsequently breast feed, that fact about the toxicity of breast milk is frightening and enraging. It really does feel like a violation - corporations and the government have allowed this shit to get into me.

Of course, there’s a large degree of agency here - we, primarily meaning Americans and other westerners, have a tremendous responsibility to reject the system of capitalism and consumption that got us into this mess. We need to wake up to the realities of what cheap, easy, and disposable all really mean in the long run - as Leonard says, someone, or more accurately many someones, are paying the real price for all of that cheap crap that many of us in the U.S. can buy easily thanks to our huge privilege relative to the rest of the world. Sometimes the people paying the price are far away and look nothing like (some of) us, but sometimes, as with toxic breast milk, we’re also paying directly and dearly. And whether we pay or someone else pays the immediate and direct costs, when it comes to the destruction of the earth, we’re all most definitely going to pay up sooner rather than later. And therefore we who live in the countries that use and abuse and benefit from the system of consumption the most have an urgent responsibility to do something about it.

Unfortunately, that responsibility and our agency to act on it are both so limited by our lack of information. The true costs of American-style production and consumption were never covered in my schooling, nor are they something that make it into the mainstream media with any depth or sufficiency. It’s easy to go through life just not knowing or even questioning how our actions and our consumption are part of a much larger system with far-reaching effects, and the profiteering corporations are more than happy to keep it that way. In such a dearth of information and truth, resources like this movie are vital and can go a long way towards providing the knowledge people need in order to understand what this culture of consumption is doing to them as individuals, to their communities, to other people, and to the environment.

Of course, it’s hard to figure out what the hell to do after looking at a video like that. I appreciate that the Story of Stuff site provides “10 Little and Big Things You Can Do”, along with a resources page that includes recommended reading and links to NGOs working on these issues.

* Note that for the most part this doesn’t mean “better” products in terms of durability and sustainability; Leonard also states that only 1% of consumer products are still actually in use just six months from the date of purchase, which boggles the mind.

Reclaim the Oil

A friend of mine sends on the following message:

Apologies for the short notice but we just found out that ExxonMobil is sponsoring tomorrow’s Go Green Earth Day Festival in McCarren Park. ExxonMobil is also responsible for the largest oil spill in America’s history, larger than the Exxon Valdez, just meters away from where the festival will be taking place!

Other festival sponsors include BP America, Waste Management, and Forest City Ratner Company (responsible for the Atlantic Yards project). These companies are no friend to our community, and no friend to the environment.

Please join the Greenpoint SuperFUNd SuperFriendz in taking immediate action.

NOW: Send an automatic email letter expressing your outrage to the powers that be:http://stage.citizenspeak.org/node/1268

SATURDAY (tomorrow): Join us at McCarren Park for a protest rally. We’re calling on YOU to help reclaim Earth Day from the greenwashers and reclaim the oil from McCarren Park!

Reclaim the Oil!
Saturday, April 19, 11am
Meet at Driggs and N. 12th
By the dog run

There’s oil a plenty underfoot and we oil men will be on hand with rig, drills, and buckets to reclaim our oil and our earth (day).

Dear Exxon, We Drink Your Milkshake!!!!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
About Greenwashing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwash
The term is generally used when significantly more money or time has been spent advertising being green (that is, operating with consideration for the environment), rather than spending resources on environmentally sound practices. This is often portrayed by changing the name or label of a product, to give the feeling of nature, for example putting an image of a forest on a bottle of harmful chemicals. Environmentalists often use greenwashing to describe the actions of energy companies, which are traditionally the largest polluters.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
About the Greenpoint ExxonMobil Oil Spill:
http://www.greenpointvexxon.com/

Between 17 and 30 million gallons of oil lie beneath North Brooklyn. See here for oodles of press coverage: http://www.greenpointvexxon.com/index.htm#press

Love it.

It’s Beyond the Environment

Horton Hears a Sexist

horton hears a who

Peter Sagal asks, What did Dr. Suess do to movie producers to make them so desperate to pervert his work? This time around, film makers created a brand-new subplot wherein the Major of Whoville has 96 daughters and one son.

Guess who gets all of his attention? Guess who saves the day?

You should read Sagal’s whole piece (it’s short), but this was my favorite part:

And there’s this — not only does the movie end with father and son embracing, while the 96 daughters are, I guess, playing in a well, somewhere, but the son earns his father’s love by saving the world. Boys get to save the world, and girls get to stand there and say, I knew you could do it. How did they know he could do it? Maybe because they watched every other movie ever made?

We got into the car outside the cinpeplex and I was quite in lather, let me tell you. How come one of the GIRLs didn’t get to save Whoville? I cried.

“Yeah!” said my daughters.

“And while we’re at it, how come a girl doesn’t get to blow up the Death Star! Or send ET home? Or defeat Captain Hook! Or Destroy the Ring of Power!”

“That’s rotten!” cried my daughters.

“How come Trinity can’t be the One who defeats the Matrix!” I yelled.

“What are you talking about?” they said.

“You’ll find out later,” I said. “But here’s one: how come a girl doesn’t get to defeat Lord Voldemort!”

“Well, wait a minute, Papa,” they said. “None of us would want to mess with him.”

I took their point. But I still wanted to grab that fictional, silly mayor of Whoville by his weirdly ruffled neck, and say, you see those 96 people over there? Those girls, those women, those daughters? You know what they’re saying to you, every minute of every day that you waste thinking about anything else?

They are shouting at you. They are shouting:

“We are here! We are here! We are here!”

Thanks to Julia for the link.

Last week, it hit 65 degrees in New York

funny-pictures-global-warming-polar-bear.jpg

And seven of the eight warmest years on record have occurred since 2001. But yeah, global warming is just a myth.

Gore


"This is not really a political issue so much as a moral issue."
 

Cutting back on babies to save the earth?

Nope, can’t support it.

I’m all for decreasing the amount of harm we do to the environment. I’m all for making the choice to reduce the number of kids you have if that’s what you want. What I worry about, though, is who will be pressured to reduce their “child output,” and which characteristics will be valued when we’re deciding which reproducers make the cut.

I realize that the article is about voluntarily having fewer children. But at some point, if this catches on, the conversation will move past “This is a good, environmentally-friendly choice.” It’ll shift to a discussion of how we can incentivize people to make the fewer-children choice, and incentives easily shift into coercion. The people who are most vulnerable to coercion are often the ones who have the least power. Hopefully I don’t have to spell out what that means in a society as inequitable as ours, with a history as ugly as ours.

My Favorite Concept Ever…

Is harm reduction. And I don’t mean it in the standard public-health way (though of course that’s awesome too).

I was introduced to the idea of harm reduction as applied more broadly through an interview with Julia Butterfly Hill that appeared in the spring 2005 issue of LiP (”Addicted to Waste: Harm Reduction, Disposability and the Myth of Activist Purity”), and I’ve thought about it pretty much every day ever since.

Unfortunately, the interview’s not available online, but here’s the nugget of what Hill had to say: “In our addiction to oil, in our addiction to capitalism, in our addiction to consumerism, in our addiction to comfortability, the first things we need to look at as activists are…how [we can] create incentives for people to reduce that harm, on themselves, on their communities and on the planet.”

It’s easiest to see how useful this approach is when it comes to environmental issues—recycling, conservation, giving up our disposable cups, etc. don’t mean we’re not still doing damage, but doing less damage is pretty much always a good thing. (Banal but true, and all too easy to loose sight of.)

But I think it also applies to pretty much anything, whether we’re talking about our own consumption habits (of everything from food and clothing to TV, magazines, porn) or broader projects of social justice. Harm reduction is basically the best antidote I’ve come across to making the perfect the enemy of the good (or at least the better). And I think we all need a whole lot more of that.

Aquafina is tap water.

Shocker. Aquafina also tastes disgusting, in my personal opinion.

Really, if you like your water purified, get a Brita or a filter and re-use your water bottles. There is no need to muck up the environment with millions of used plastic bottles.

Spidey Sense

Spiderman *hearts* family planning. The comic is from the 1970s, so the information is a little outdated, but it’s… something.

Thanks to Norbizness and Trina for the link.