Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Posts tagged gender roles

Genderless future?


This week, Newsweek asked: Are We Facing a Genderless Future?

Although no one is keeping statistics, researchers who study gender say a small but growing number of people (including some who have had sex-change operations) consider themselves “gender neutral” or “gender variant.” Their stories vary widely. Some find that even after surgery, they simply can’t ignore previous years of experience living as another gender. Others may feel that their gender identity is fluid. Still others are experimenting with where they feel most comfortable on what they see as a continuum of gender.

I'm all for more mainstream and respected media outlets covering this issue because I think right now, far too many people view those who step outside of gender boxes as a small group of freaks whom, if we ignore, will eventually go away. But Newsweek is absolutely right: as more and more people realize that "there is no way that six billion people can be categorized into two groups," the group of people who define gender on their own terms is growing.

But I've said before: I personally don't aim for a genderless future -- instead, I hope for a society that embraces the right of each person to define their own gender. Seriously, can't we get rid of those tired and constricting "male" and "female" check-boxes on every form we have to fill out and replace it with a blank line instead?

Tagged with:

Why Is Eat, Pray, Love So Popular?

We have already discussed the imperialistic and racist dimensions of Eat, Pray, Love. Today, a movie based on this book is coming out and it is predicted to be a huge success. So why is there such a huge (mostly female) following the book and movie about what one reviewer calls a "pampered princess on constant display" with a "petulant, overblown ego"? Female life choices are still pretty
Categories: Activism

Women as Furniture

If you have been around this blog in the past month, you must already know how much I hoped Spain would win the World Cup. When they did, I was ecstatically happy but only until I started watching the after-game award ceremony. Just watch the following appalling video, and you will know what I mean. It disturbed me so much I didn't even feel like celebrating. So here we have the happy Spanish

Sexism: everywhere, even in birthday cards

Straight from Sociological Images, I didn't know whether to be appalled or just laugh at this utterly ridiculous birthday card from Dublin:




Oh, how cute.

Suggested Sunday reading (6/13/10)

Just a quick reminder, you can submit links for this column via e-mail at rosiered23 (at) sparecandy (dot) com, and you can catch up with Spare Candy on Twitter, Facebook or Tumblr as well. Or! Leave a link in the comments! Self-promotion is perfectly acceptable here.

  • US News and World Report: "Kids With Lesbian Parents Do Just Fine." Something many of us already know, but I guess it's a good thing to see it "confirmed"?
  • New York magazine: "Transgender Protection Bill Defeated in State Senate." Awful news from the state of New York regarding the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act. I hope this isn't the end of the legislation.
  • CNN: "Surgery no longer a requirement for changing gender on passport." Good news!
  • Pigtail Pals: "What The Hell Happened To Summer Camp?" There are definitely some questionable summer camps programs out there; this is among the worst I've seen. (Though I have no doubt that many 4-year-old girls would love this.) But speaking of summer camps, this one for transgender children sounds great: "Camp Aranu'tiq -- A Summer Camp Of Our Own," at Transgriot.
  • Fem2.0: "A week of important news for women." (Thanks for including Spare Candy!)
  • Slate: "A Short History of 'Feminist' Anti-Feminists."
  • Pandagon: "Why don’t women cook as much as they used to?" Good stuff here.
  • USA Today: "FDA panel to mull 'morning-after pill' effective 5 days after sex." This is already available in Europe and is said to be more effective than Plan B.
  • Feministing: "Just When You Thought American Apparel Couldn't Fail Any Harder..." Yes, I will always let people know what a horrible company this is.
  • New York Times: "In Sweden, the Men Can Have It All." Like 13-month parental leave from work! This is part of a series "examining where women stand in the early 21st century." There are links to other stories from this one.
  • Change.org: "Equal Pay Act, 47 Years Later." Still not equal. Do think it ever will be?
  • New York Times: "The Animal-Cruelty Syndrome." Discusses how animal cruelty is also associated with other crimes like domestic violence.
  • Newsweek has a big series on marriage, with stories like "I Don't: The case against marriage, "I Do. Here’s Why," and "I Do, Too," here, here and here. (There are also other stories.)
  • This review of the movie "Splice" is making its way around the internet, but I wanted to include in case anyone is thinking about seeing the movie and might want to know about some triggering plot points of the movie. It's full of spoilers, but worth reading, even with the all-caps writing style.
  • Chicago Tribune: "Going undercover: A mother wrestles with her daughter's decision to wear a hijab." Good first-person piece.
  • Jezebel: "When Your Breast Shape Goes Out Of Style." Yeah, did you know that can happen? You can thank Playboy for letting us know what kind of breasts are "fashionable." Like breasts are shoes, or something.
  • Reuters: "UN committee moves to keep out gay-lesbian NGO." Sigh.
  • New York Times: "Gay Couples Gain Under Violence Against Women Act." The headline is poorly worded, I think, given the subject matter, but ultimately this is a good thing.
  • The Sexist: "Sexist Beatdown: The Chat They Didn’t Want You to Read! Edition." About leaked celebrity sex tapes.
  • Feministe: "Girl hospitalized after self-inducing abortion" She is 13 years old. Her "boyfriend" is 30 years old.
  • NBC Miami: "Crist Vetoes Ultrasound Abortion Bill." This is good news.

Rape and Rape Culture
  • Daily Kos: "Outrage: Republican Senator blames 16-year-old rape victim!" This involves Nevada state Sen. Dennis Nolan, who said "he feels 'compelled to believe the sex was consensual' because the 16-year-old victim had been 'very sexually active' prior to the rape," among other things.
  • Feministing: "New teen sex study erases sexual assault."
  • The Pursuit of Harpyness: "High school students silenced after attempting to raise sexual abuse awareness." Ugh.
  • AWID: "Mexico: Supreme Court Protects Rape Victims." Says all women rape victims should have access to emergency contraception and abortion services. What a concept!
  • The Curvature: "Rape, Male Victims, and Why We Need to Care."


Sexism in FairyLand: Disney’s Pixie Hollow Won’t Let Girls Wear Pants

Mom, Disney is a sexist company, isn’t it.

Out of the mouths of babes, and 9 year olds, come important truths. But I like to wait it out, rather than presume, so I reply with:

Why do you say that, honey?

On Pixie Hollow I want to buy pants for my fairies. I have the credits, but Pixie Hollow won’t let fairies wear pants.

But they have pants for sale?

Only to the Sparrow Men. You can buy pants for your boy fairies but not for your fairies.  Even if you have the money.

201006110824.jpgCan the boys buy skirts?

No. So it’s even more sexist, isn’t it!

Momentarily, I congratulate my self that my own 4th grader is developing a discrimination detector.

Then, I come over to the computer to make sure she hasn’t missed something in the game. Maybe she’s just doing something wrong in the game that is preventing her from buying pants for her fairy.

Together, we go through the process — my daughter earned the game points, she went to the game store, and she can’t buy pants for her pixies.

Thanks for the friendly “reminder” of what girls can’t do, Pixie Hollow.

As designed, the game only lets players dress their fairies in dresses wings, shoes, and bows, while the Sparrow Men can have only pants, shirts, and wings.

(The name ‘Sparrow Men” comes from the book Peter Pan. Why they are not sparrowboys, or simply fairoes instead of fairies, I don’t know.)

This is what we parents call a “learning opportunity”.

Is Pixie Hollow’s “No Pants for Girls” Rule intentional sexism?

Pixie Hollow’s dress code  may well be “benevolent sexism” or “enlightened sexism”. It may even be unintentional sexism, if  the whole constraint is a technological oversight. Maybe the Sparrow Men module was developed as an add-on and they didn’t think to integrate all the pieces?

The cause of the pants prohibition for fairies may be rather benign. It’s not like we’re imagining some malevolent, Taliban-inspired product manager decreeing that girls fairies may not wear pants because it isn’t “appropriate” in Pixie Hollow. Maybe it never occurred to them that fairies might want to wear pants.

However, it doesn’t matter whether someone was overtly, consciously sexist or not. The game is sexist. It imposes its own gendered norms for what is kind of pixie appearance is appropriate. For no reason at all.

As Joe Gerstandt explains, it’s the outcome that counts. If an outcome creates a sexist or racist experience, even if not consciously intended by the creators, it is still sexist, and still needs to be changed.

My daughter and I have talked about the Fairy Dress Code issue at length now. She’s done a little research, and determined that there’s just no reason why girl fairies can’t wear pants. Although most of the books about fairies depict the fairies (mostly all female) in dresses, skirts, or flower petals (which are themselves skirt-like), there is no fairy queen or kind who has decreed that girl fairies can’t wear pants.

So there’s something wrong in the real world.

201006110742.jpg

Do Pixie Dress Codes really matter?

You may think it’s silly to be concerned that in an online game, the girl fictional creatures are unable to do something so simple as wear pants, while the boy fictional creatures can. But it’s not that silly.

First, in the ‘up close an personal’ perspective, my kid has earned the points, they are her fairies, why can’t she dress them as she pleases?

Second, I don’t want my kid to have to confront sexism in her toys. Her dad and I have gone to a lot of trouble to raise her to understand that her sex, her gender performance, her race, and her other ‘categorizes’ should never be barriers to what she wants to do or who she wants to be.

Sexist Dress Codes: Real manifestations of real obstacles

Girls especially, but sometimes boys too, begin to notice that girls and boys are treated differently. They know this in their hearts, and they feel it in their experience, but they often don’t “see” gendering or discrimination in material and concrete ways that they can easily grok.

My daughters still find it hard to believe that there was no girls’ soccer team when I was in high school, that it was only in 1973 that women were ‘allowed’ to keep their names when they got married, and that I keep getting mail addressed to Mr. & Mrs. DearHusband, rather than Dr. Harquail and Mr. DearHusband. And those are only the visible, superficial manifestations… don’t even get me started on the number of girls in my 6th grader’s accelerated math class.

Yes, we know that Pixie Hollow is a completely sexist universe.

The entire Pixie Hollow game is sexist, as is the book it was based on and the Disney franchise that it extends. Just check out the list, here, of fun things you can do in Pixie Hollow.

[Note: I'm trying to balance out my kid's experience by having her play Call of Duty 2 with her dad.  Just kidding. Actually, I take solace in the Star Wars fantasy play where they all fight over who gets the red light saber and thus gets to be the Jedi "Master".]

In the grand scheme of sexism, the issue of pants being forbidden for fairies is a really small one. But on Pixie Hollow, it’s a big deal. An important element of the game revolves around “adorning” your pixie avatar. So why are choices for that adornment limited along gender lines?

June 11th is Wear The Pants Day

Today, of all days, this dress code at Pixie Hollow is annoying my daughter.

Today is Wear The Pants Day, sponsored by my daughter’s favorite magazine, New Moon Girls. 201006110833.jpg

New Moon Girls, the feisty and fun feminist magazine and online community made by and for girls, wants females to observe “Wear The Pants Day” this Friday (June 11th) because girls and women around the world are still forbidden or discouraged from wearing pants. Yes, it is 2010, and yet:

Girls and women are beaten, arrested and worse for wearing pants, even loose pants covered by skirts. Just last week, Indonesian women wearing jeans had their pants confiscated and were ordered to don long skirts. Schoolgirls in Sudan were flogged last fall for wearing pants, and while international outrage helped keep flogging at bay for Sudanese journalist Lubna Hussein, she must pay a fee for the crime of wearing pants. Last September, some 20 Ugandan women wearing pants were stripped and left to walk home in underwear.

Right here in the US, plenty of anti-pants expectations remain. Just two years ago, the Wall Street Journal reported on persistent bias against pants-wearing women in many white-collar professions such as law and finance, and polled readers about whether pants or skirts were more appropriate for women. Readers approved pants, but only by a narrow margin. Female college grads are still warned to stick to skirts to grease the skids to the top in many professions. And girls and women in conservative religious communities face formal and informal proscriptions against pants-wearing.

Just when you think that wearing pants or not is trivial, you remember it isn’t trivial.

Changing the Dress Code at Pixie Hollow

We are working on our letter to the folks at Pixie Hollow. We’ve heard that Sparrow Men were added to Pixie Hollow because some boys and girls wrote to Disney and asked that boys be explicitly included in Pixie Hollow.  While the explicit inclusion of male characters fixed the previous workaround (where players created androgynous-looking avatars and gave them ambiguous names so that the characters could be boy fairies), we’d like Disney to take their inclusion/ exclusion efforts a little further.

While we work on changing Disney’s online world, my girl is making a statement in the real world. Today, on Wear the Pants day, she’s going to school in …. a skirt.

She’s been convinced, by Svea’s letter on the New Moon Girls site, that by wearing a skirt she can make a point and learn something new. As Svea writes:

I made the decision to wear a skirt on June 11.I am going to wear a skirt for two reasons. First, to celebrate my freedom of being able to wear skirts, and second to imagine what it would be like if I had to wear a skirt every single day. Also, I wear pants every single day, so for me, having a wear the pants day would have virtually no symbolic meaning. It would be like having brush your teeth day or eat dinner day.

Dear Disney,

We’d like to be able to dress our pixies however we chose, thank you very much. And, we’d like to be able to wear what we want, regardless of someone else’s expectations of what’s gender appropriate.

That freedom should exist for fairies and sparrowguys in Pixie Hollow, and girls and boys everywhere in the world.

We’re not going to be able to change all the sexism in the game, or all the sexism in the world, but we’ll do our best to make a difference where we can.201006110747.jpg

See also:
Joe Gerstandt, on Our Time To Act: Disentangling Intentions from Outcomes, and

This article, which takes the discussion of sexism on Pixie Hollow pretty far, but leaves about 10% of the work for you to continue on your own: Tinker … bill? Disney fairies get a sex change: At long last, boys come to Pixie Hollow — and that’s a win for kids of both genders, by Mary Elizabeth Williams, on Slate’s Broadsheet

Want oral sex? Buy her pretty things!

Oh my goodness, now I want to go down on you!

Came across a charming article from The Frisky called 19 Ways to Get Her to Go Down. According to this list, dudes can get blowies from their chicks by doing things such as: buying her jewelry, taking her to the opera, sending her flowers, or giving her an engagement ring.

How about: ask us and we'll "go down" if we effin' feel like it? Why all the bass-ackwards ulterior motive bullshit and not, oh I don't know, communicating with your partner? Major fail on the part of The Frisky and on the (female) author for perpetuating stereotypes that men are conniving assholes, and women are shallow gold-diggers.

“Screw Marriage” Tuesday

I've stated before that I'm not the biggest fan of the institution of marriage. To sum it up: I don't need a piece of paper from the government to validate who I'm allowed to love, and I don't feel comfortable being a part of a patriarchal and exclusive institution that I feel wrongfully dominates our society. That being said, I don't judge anyone who chooses to get married, feminists included.

Anywho!

For those who dig the idea of challenging holy matrimony, check out Liz Langley of AlterNet's Eight Reasons Marriage Doesn't Matter. I applaud anyone who's gutsy enough to take on the ginormous institution of marriage.
Tagged with: ,

Reproductive coercion


I'm encouraging everyone to head over to AlterNet to check out a recent article, "My Boyfriend Stole My Birth Control": When Men Force Women to Get Pregnant Against Their Will.

Scary new evidence is showing that a significant number of women experience their partners trying to steal away their bodily control through "reproductive coercion," or the act of forcing a pregnancy onto someone.

In the largest study of this phenomenon to date, “Pregnancy Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence and Unintended Pregnancy,” published in the January issue of the journal Contraception, lead researcher Elizabeth Miller and others surveyed nearly 1,300 16- to 29-year-old women who’d sought a variety of services at five different Northern California reproductive health clinics. Among those who had experienced intercourse, i.e., who could be at risk of unintended pregnancy, not only did 53 percent of respondents say they’d experienced physical or sexual violence from a partner, but one in five said they had experienced pregnancy coercion; 15 percent said they experienced birth control sabotage, including hiding or flushing birth control pills down the toilet, intentional breaking of condoms and removing contraceptive rings or patches. These figures were consistent from clinic to clinic.

Currently, this phenomenon is little-known, and the prevailing stereotype is still "the woman—call her the femme fertile—who conspires to get pregnant, perhaps by 'forgetting' to take her birth control pills, as a way to 'trap a man' and force marriage—or at least keep him in her life." But people need to know that there is another scarily common situation out there: the boyfriend or husband who, disgusted by a woman's ability to have reproductive control, goes to heinous measures to force pregnancies, abortions, or miscarriages onto his partner.

This is some seriously fucked-up stuff. Spread the word, feminists. Please.

Genderfuck Thursday

After finding out about the wonderful Genderfork.com (via Feministing) I had an urge to post an ode to gender-bending, because I just love it so damn much. First of all, if you haven't been to Genderfork, visit it ASAP! It is a lovely blog with user-submitted photos...


...and quotes from those who find beauty and pleasure in androgyny and ambiguity:

"Some days I wish I could set my gender on Facebook to 'It's complicated.'"

"People think they're being invasive when they ask me questions some might consider 'personal'— questions about my body, my gender, the way I look, think, etc. They don't seem to understand I love being able to tell people there's a different way of existing out there. Not everything is black and white, just 'this' or 'that.' There's a 'Thiat' and a 'Thast' and every combination you can possibly dream up."

"I bound and buttoned up for church; I wore a fancy dress that showed off my hairy armpits for dinner. This Easter is one big pastel-colored drag show."

I want to cry at the sheer beauty of people being able to express who they are, despite being a part of an entire society that tells them to conform. Some days I wonder if I would present myself in a more androgynous manner if I had questioned gender more while growing up, or if I wasn't so intimidated by society's reactions. Still, last year when I attended a drag ball, I had a blast trying a different gender on for size:



Genderfucking just... rules.

I've thought a lot about gender, and I know that some may argue that the world we should strive to live in is a genderless one... but my thoughts are that instead of abolishing gender altogether, let's have more gender! People take pride and pleasure in gender expression and identity, and I think the world might be a bit boring if we take that away. Let's have thousands of genders, millions, billions! Imagine a world where instead of checking "man" or "woman" on any mundane form or online profile, you're given a blank line on which to write whatever you want. My body tingles just thinking about it.

So I raise my glass to genderqueer, genderfuck, genderbend, unisex, androgynous, ambiguous, fluid, transgender, butch, and everything else.

I want to conclude with some worthwhile videos, first one of spoken word artist Kit Yan performing an amazing piece on the fluidity of gender:



And, because someone on Genderfork.com mentioned it, the music video for "I Want to Break Free," by one of my favorite gender-bending bands, Queen. Think of it in terms of breaking free from binary gender roles :D