Community hubs

This is the global Feminist Blogs aggregator. It collects articles from many smaller community hubs within the Feminist Blogs network. For stories from particular places, groups, or other communities within our movement, check out some of these sites.

Share this fundraiser with friends online using ChipIn!

Support Feminist Bloggers!

Feminist Blogs depends on contributions from readers like you to stay running. We're doing a fundraising drive for the months of February and March.

Donations provide for the costs of running feministblogs.org and provide direct financial support to active Feminist Blogs contributors. See the donation page for more details.


Posts tagged Prisons

The New Jim Crow

A must-read article about race, class, caste and the American prison system. A few facts from the piece:

  • There are more African Americans under correctional control today — in prison or jail, on probation or parole — than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
    As of 2004, more African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.
  • A black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. The recent disintegration of the African American family is due in large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.
  • If you take into account prisoners, a large majority of African American men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life. (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80%.) These men are part of a growing undercaste — not class, caste — permanently relegated, by law, to a second-class status. They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era.

The mass incarceration of African Americans over the past 30 years is primarily related to the War on Drugs — a convenient cover for a program essentially targeted at the black community. The talking points all came back to the supposed rates of drug-related violence, but that doesn’t exactly compute with historical fact:

President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising. From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican Party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by, desegregation, busing, and affirmative action. In the words of H.R. Haldeman, President Richard Nixon’s White House Chief of Staff: “[T]he whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.”

The vast majority of people arrested for drug-related offenses are non-violent, and are arrested for possession rather than selling. Just read the whole thing.

The Left Against the Prison-Guard State

(Found via New York City Anarchoblogs.)

For those of you in and around the capital of capital, here’s an upcoming event at Left Forum at Pace University in New York.

WHAT: What Does the Left Need to Know about Prison? panel with Vikki Law, Asha Bandele, Cleo Silvers, and Laura Whitehorn, moderated by Susie Day.

WHEN: Sunday, March 21, 3pm-5pm

WHERE: Left Forum, Pace University, One Pace Plaza, New York, NY 10038

What Does the Left Need to Know about Prison? (a panel at Left Forum)

Placated by TV-cop-show justice, worried about economic survival, most of the U.S. Left – like the U.S. mainstream – ignores the ongoing reality of prison in the lives of poor people and revolutionaries, alike. Yet prison in this country is the basis for the creation of new forms of increasing government/corporate control. The prison system has already played a critical role in ensuring that popular rebellions, like those of the mid-20th century, do not occur again. What do people who do support work for political and social prisoners have to teach us about building a more viable and oppositional Left?

Panelists: Vikki Law, Asha Bandele, Cleo Silvers, and Laura Whitehorn, moderated by Susie Day.

Asha Bandele: Journalist, editor-at-large of Essence magazine, mother, and author of The Prisoner’s Wife, her memoirs of her relationship with a New York State prisoner with whom she had a daughter. She is also the author of other books, including Daughter, a novel about the impact of police brutality. Asha continues her writing and work as a prison activist.

Laura Whitehorn: Political activist who was incarcerated for more than 14 years on political charges, Laura now does support work for U.S. political prisoners. At the request of Wonda Jones, daughter of former Panther, political prisoner, and prison activist Safiya Bukhari, Laura edited a compilation of Bukhari’s writings and speeches, just published by the Feminist Press.

Cleo Silvers: Former Black Panther Party member and South Bronx community worker, Cleo has worked for years as a union and labor organizer and has done extensive work on behalf of U.S. prisoners. She is currently a member of the Safiya Nuh Foundation for the Support of Political Prisoners.

Vikki Law: Writer, photographer, and mother. She is a co-founder of Books Through Bars-New York City, an organization that sends free radical literature and books to prisoners nationwide; editor of the ‘zine Tenacious: Writings from Women in Prison, and author of Resistance Behind Bars: The Struggles of Incarcerated Women (PM Press, 2009).

Susie Day: Assistant editor at Monthly Review, writes a regular satire column and has, since 1988, written about political prisoners and prisons.

at Left Forum

Pace University, One Pace Plaza
New York, NY 10038
Sunday, March 21st, 3 to 5 pm, W-504

Vikki Law, Resistance Behind Bars (2010-03-08): What Does the Left Need to Know about Prison? (a panel at Left Forum)

WA superintendent assures us only 30% of incarcerated pregnant women are shackled

Via Radical Doula, we find that as Washington state is proposed with a bill that would outlaw shackling of pregnant incarcerated women, the superintendent of Washington's only prison that houses pregnant women contended that only about 30 percent of pregnant women are restrained:

The Superintendent at the Corrections Center for Women said pregnant inmates are not restrained during the final moments of labor.

Superintendent Douglas Cole said only about 30 percent of pregnant offenders are restrained while they're at the hospital.

On those occasions, said Cole, the women are attached to the hospital bed with a 3-foot-long handcuff.

And this number is supposed to be appeasing how exactly?

Related posts:
Racism, Xenophobia and Misogyny Intersect: Giving birth while in shackles.
Victory for incarcerated pregnant women
Judge jails HIV positive woman to "protect" her fetus
New report: Mothering in Prison
Woman gives birth in jail cell, alone
Bureau of Prisons bans shackling pregnant inmates
Critical Resistance: Prisons as a Tool of Reproductive Oppression

Tagged with: ,

The problem of making sex work a sexual offense.

Just when you think that the human rights of sex workers aren't violated enough, take a look at this centuries-old law that allows sex workers to be branded as sex offenders.

New Orleans city police and the district attorney's office are using a state law written for child molesters to charge hundreds of sex workers like Tabitha as sex offenders. The law, which dates back to 1805, makes it a crime against nature to engage in "unnatural copulation"--a term New Orleans cops and the district attorney's office have interpreted to mean anal or oral sex. Sex workers convicted of breaking this law are charged with felonies, issued longer jail sentences and forced to register as sex offenders. They must also carry a driver's license with the label "sex offender" printed on it.

Of the 861 sex offenders currently registered in New Orleans, 483 were convicted of a crime against nature, according to Doug Cain, a spokesperson with the Louisiana State Police. And of those convicted of a crime against nature, 78 percent are Black and almost all are women.

The law impacts sex workers in both small and large ways.

Tabitha has to register an address in the sex offender database, and because she doesn't have a permanent home, she has registered the address of a nonprofit organization that is helping her. She also has to purchase and mail postcards with her picture to everyone in the neighborhood informing them of her conviction. If she needs to evacuate to a shelter during a hurricane, she must evacuate to a special shelter for sex offenders, and this shelter has no separate safe spaces for women. She is even prohibited from very ordinary activities in New Orleans like wearing a costume at Mardi Gras.

This is one of the best articles I have seen that has brought an intersectional lens to this aspect of sex work. This article uses intersectionality to explore the plight of how members of our society who are already marginalized face additional discrimination by the criminal justice system as sex workers. Intersectionality is an important device in this piece because it allows for us to view the current marginalization of sex workers in the context WOC and transgender women live.

On many fronts, transgender women and WOC--whether they are sex workers or not--have their rights to sexual privacy contested. This can be seen in the incessant, inappropriate line of questioning transgender folks face about their sexuality or the way Black women's sexuality has been demonized when black women have non-traditional paths to motherhood. All in all, violations against the sexual privacy of WOC and transgender women are countless.

As the writer tells the story of these women, she attempts to offer them redress by granting them some modicum of privacy that has been taken away by a punitive, unjust system. One example of this is the writer grants the sex workers' request to not reveal their first and last names in an environment where the state has effectively revoked these women's rights to privacy, and particularly sexual privacy, simply because they have engaged in sex work.

Time will tell whether next month's Mayoral elections in New Orleans will yield an elected official that reappoints a police chief that views these "unnatural copulation" laws on the books as antiquated and therefore not worth enforcing. However, Melissa Harris-Lacewell, a feminist favorite around these parts, has a partner that is running for mayor in New Orleans, James Perry. He vows to reduce crime by 40 percent. Ostensibly, this will involve some level of decriminalization. At this point, this issue is impossible to take a public position on as a candidate.
But, if I was a betting woman, I would guess his commitment to civil rights makes him the most likely to be sympathetic with the unfortunate plight of New Orleans' sex workers.

Warden Responsible for “Lesbian Cell Block” Is Stepping Down.

It was discovered that the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women in Virginia was separating inmates they felt had masculine attributes and putting them in their own cell block to separate them from the rest of the population. All of the links to this original story seems to be down. Hmm.

Now the warden, Barbara Wheeler, is stepping down in the middle of the investigation.

via NYTimes.

Department of Corrections spokesman Larry Traylor said Monday that Barbara Wheeler will retire as warden of Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women. He would not say when or provide other details.

State Sen. Frank Ruff, R-Mecklenburg, asked the department in June to look into allegations that the prison curtailed inmates' access to religious services and separated masculine-looking prisoners from the rest of the population at the 1,200-inmate facility in Troy.

His request followed an Associated Press report in June that inmates -- mostly lesbians -- who wore short hair and baggy clothes and had more masculine features had been segregated in a wing commonly referred to as the ''butch wing'' or ''little boys wing'' for more than a year. Inmates and guards said the practice stopped after the AP questioned Wheeler about it.

Horrifying stories of what prisons do when you are not looking continue to outdo themselves.

Tagged with:

Abuse of Pregnant Prisoners Goes Beyond Shackling During Labor

We’ve written here at Feministe before about the common practice of U.S. prisons shackling pregnant prisoners in while they are in labor. And despite the increased recognition that such treatment is inhuman, it’s one that has not entirely ceased.

Now an article over at Alternet (originally published at The Nation) gives us awful if not hugely shocking news: shackling during labor isn’t the only atrocious and dangerous treatment that pregnant prisoners are receiving. Rather, many have been undergoing abuse at the hands of the prison system for months:

When women are brought to a hospital in shackles, the pain and humiliation they endure likely caps months of difficulty from being pregnant behind bars, months without adequate prenatal care or nutrition, or even basics like a bed to sleep on or clothes to accommodate their changing shape.

The lack of common sense and compassion with which imprisoned pregnant women are treated is chilling. Three stories illustrate the dangers women face when they cannot get anyone to take their medical needs seriously.

First, some women are not taken to the hospital until after they have already given birth, despite having informed staff members that they are in labor. Women wind up giving birth in their cells with the assistance of a nurse, corrections officer or cellmates. Others give birth in their cells with nobody to help. Both situations endanger the woman and her baby. Nineteen-year-old Terra K. screamed, pounded on the door and asked for the nurse in the Dubuque County Jail in Iowa, only to give birth alone in her cell. Afterward she asked, “How does somebody have a baby in jail without anybody noticing?”

The article tells the equally distressing story of a woman whose fetus died in utero due to a lack of needed medical care, only to have prison officials then delay getting the dead fetus removed from her body, as well as that of a woman who miscarried as a result of an assault by other prisoners, and who ended up requiring surgery and a blood transfusion because prison officials refused to take her to the hospital in a timely manner.

Further, while these incidents would be horrifying and entirely unacceptable even if they were unusual, sadly they’re not:

These are not isolated events; they are just a few that recently made the news. Institutions of confinement are not required to report the pregnancy outcomes of women in their custody. Until elected officials mandate such reporting, we will have to rely on the efforts of imprisoned women, journalists, human rights investigators, researchers, lawyers and advocates to document the reality of life for pregnant women inside prison walls. Reflecting on more than thirty years of experience, ACLU National Prison Project director Elizabeth Alexander says, “In virtually every case that I have handled involving healthcare claims of women, I have found women who lost their pregnancies or newborns due to the prison’s atrocious neglect.”

The denial of appropriate care to pregnant women is part and parcel of the general state of medical neglect in prisons in the United States. Access to timely, appropriate medical care is further undermined by the trend to contract out medical services to private, for-profit companies.

When it comes to these issues, I feel like we talk a lot about a lack of prison oversight — rather than why so many people are in prisons to begin with, whether prison is really the best place for most of these people to be, and why such conditions are allowed to exist at all. And while the first two are unfortunately a bit beyond the scope of this post and my knowledge base, I don’t think we can really begin to intelligently discuss this issue at all without looking at the last.

I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again: this is what happens when we decide that people who have broken the law (or are merely accused of doing so!) have relinquished their most basic and inalienable human rights. This is what happens when we decide that punishing people is worth more than our Constitution, ethics, or simple decency. This is what happens when a system steeped in racism, classism, ableism, and misogyny is given complete control over people’s lives, with everyone else throwing up their hands and saying “they should have thought about that before.” And while I’m ranting, it’s also what happens when (usually privileged) people run around complaining about how “those criminals have better health care than I do,” both spreading a generally untrue, misleading, and dangerous myth, and also suggesting that health care is not something that ought to be a right for all, but something that is earned off of some kind of “objective” personal merit.

It would be easy to sit here and make arguments about the number of imprisoned women who have committed non-violent crimes, and to discuss the important subject of how unjust societal factors lead people to break the law, but I’m not going to reinforce the notion that this would somehow be acceptable for certain women. No person deserves to give birth alone on a cold jail cell floor. No person deserves to leak amniotic fluid for almost two weeks, pleading to be taken to a doctor, until her fetus’ skull collapses. No person deserves to live with an incomplete miscarriage for three weeks until they start bleeding almost to death, because a simple follow-up visit was not allowed to be attended.

This kind of treatment ought to be considered cruel and unusual by any standard. And it’s only allowed to exist as it does because we live in a bigoted society that wallows in a smug sense of superiority and believes it has the credentials and the prerogative to determine that some people don’t deserve the right to safety or even life. Not just because of a lack of oversight, but because so many non-incarcerated people don’t even want that oversight, and actively resist it. Not just because our government is prejudiced and cruel, but because many average people also think that the women living under these abusive conditions are getting exactly what they deserve.

I’m not a big fan of standing up for Mike Huckabee, but…

His clemency of Maurice Clemmons, who is believed to have shot and killed four police officers, should not be an issue. Clemons was sent to jail at 16, sentenced for more than 100 years for burglary and robbery. Huckabee commuted his sentence, and made him eligible for parole. A parole board evaluated the circumstances of the case and paroled him.

In a criminal justice system as vast and over-reaching as ours, it can be nearly impossible to determine who will commit crimes again and who will not. Obviously certain factors play a role in both estimating the probability of reoffense and in determining who should serve longer sentences — the violence involved in the underlying crime, the convicted person’s ties with criminal activity outside of prison, the person’s behavior while inside — but it’s not a perfect calculus. Forcing someone to serve a full prison term also doesn’t guarantee that they will never reoffend.

Huckabee’s decision to commute Clemmons’ sentence was not what killed those police officers. Governors should be able to check an over-zealous justice system in situations like this one, where a minor was sentenced to a century behind bars for an offense that, as far as I can tell, included no physical harm to other people. It turns out that Clemmons was actually a horrible man, and I’m not trying to downplay his evil actions after prison. But it’s important to keep in mind that this series of events is the exception rather than the rule. And as much as I love to criticize Huckabee, this one isn’t on his shoulders.

Also, what Josh said. The commutation file is worth a read.

Tagged with: , , ,

Racism, Xenophobia and Misogyny Intersect: Giving birth while in shackles.


This is what an asshole looks like.

In Sheriff Joe Arpaio's world, this is acceptable behavior.

The most recent atrocity committed by the self-proclaimed "America's Toughest Sheriff" involves a woman who was detained while 9-months pregnant. Alma Minerva Chacon's case has been receiving media attention due to the brutality with which she was treated. The very same night of her arrest, Chacon went into labor and found herself afraid and alone, being rushed to a local hospital with her hands and legs chained in shackles.

Once she reached the hospital, nurses repeatedly begged the Sheriff's staff to allow them to unchain the mother, but they refused and Chacon was forced to give birth while still shackled to the bed. At one point, the nurse asked for them to release her so that she could be escorted to the bathroom for a urinalysis, but even that request was denied. But the worst came once Chacon gave birth to her baby girl.

Still chained to the bed, Arpaio's police staff refused to allow Chacon to hold her newborn baby and then warned her that if no one came to pick up the child within 72 hours, she would be turned over into state custody.

via Latina.com

This is disgusting. We are well aware that Arpaio is no charmer, tasking himself with attempted eradication of Latinos in his fair state of Arizona, but this is horrifying. Not only is it a basic negligence of a person's basic human rights, it is a very misogynistic act of control, denying a mother the ability to give birth in a safe and healthy way or allowing her to see her child. You must really hate a group of people to legislate in this way. And well, law dictated by personal feelings of hatred is not really law at all.

It is also worth noting that Arpaio was told by (the notorious!) US Immigration and Customs Enforcement that he will be losing power to carry out the ridiculous extension of federal law given to some local enforcement by ICE.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said Friday that they limited the ability of the Sheriff's Office to enforce federal immigration laws because of the office's record of conducting wide-ranging crime sweeps intended to identify illegal immigrants. Those sweeps - the Sheriff's Office has conducted 11 in the past year and a half - have led primarily to arrests of people who have not committed serious crimes. The revamped federal program places a priority on going after dangerous criminals, not illegal immigrants encountered as the result of minor offenses like traffic violations.

An organization that is responsible for some of the most violent attacks on migrants, has told Arpaio, he has gone too far. And his response? That he will stop at nothing to clear Arizona of all illegals.

""You know what? They can take away anything they want. I'm still the elected sheriff," Sheriff Arpaio told Fox News' Glenn Beck this week. "I'm still going to enforce the state laws and I'm going to enforce the federal laws."

via CSM.

Uh, Joe...you can't claim to uphold the law and then try and enforce it illegally.

Take action against Joe Arpaio. Stop this rogue sheriff!

Support Advocacy for Incarcerated Women- Vote for New Voices

New Voices Pittsburgh: Women of Color for Reproductive Justice is competing for funding from the "Women and Girls Foundation. The group is led by badass young women of color and they are being considered for a 10,000 dollar grant if they get enough votes through the web. New Voices is also a member of SisterSong, which folks may remember from the post on Loretta Ross last week. Here is a brief description of the project New Voices wants to take on:

The "FOCUS on Women" Campaign, a grassroots community organizing initiative, will redress the current conditions of non-violent female offenders housed in Allegheny County Jail (ACJ), including reproductive and general healthcare, nutrition and as well as trauma-informed care in human services delivery. Our campaign centralizes the experiences of women who are currently or have been previously incarcerated in ACJ, organizes women/communities of color through Human Rights and Reproductive Justice and develops new voices for leadership in Pittsburgh.

Here are some facts about incarcerated women, most of whom are single moms, from recent coverage:

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the number of women behind bars has increased 843 percent in the last three decades, growing from 12,279 in 1977 to 115,779 last year.

As University of Pittsburgh is my alma mater, I have worked with New Voices personally. Their organization was one of the many orgs that were conceived during the 2004 March for Women's Lives. I can tell you that they are some of the most organized, dedicated young women in the feminist movement right now. Voting ends at 5pm today. Support badass young women of color who are advocating for justice for women.

Tagged with: ,

Sara Kruzan: Life Without Parole for Killing her Pimp

*Content is triggering*

This story speaks for itself. From the free Sara Kruzan action page at change.org:

"Life without parole means absolutely no opportunity for release," said Senator Yee. (of California) "It also means minors are often left without access to programs and rehabilitative services while in prison. This sentence was created for the worst of criminals that have no possibility of reform and it is not a humane way to handle children. While the crimes they committed caused undeniable suffering, these youth offenders are not the worst of the worst."

"As a society we've learned a lot since the time we started using life without parole for children," said Elizabeth Calvin, a children's rights advocate with Human Rights Watch. "We now know that this sentence provides no deterrent effect. While children who commit serious crimes should be held accountable, public safety can be protected without subjecting youth to the harshest prison sentence possible."

Watch. Listen. Weep. Take Action.

Also, read our previous coverage on prisons.

Categories: Activism