With thanks to Chris who entreated me to resist my stated urge to nuke this blog altogether, and to Joriel who didn’t push either way, but was just her unfalteringly kind self in response to this Twitter-hosted text message tantrum. And everyone else whose emails, phone calls, and blog posts I haven’t been responding to - you know who you are.
After experiencing absurdly complicated (and also utterly uninteresting) technical difficulties dating back almost a month, this blog has been more or less comatose. Suffice it to say the new version of Wordpress seemed to me designed with the specific intent to render, if not all blogs, then at least mine utterly inoperable, so after pulling my hair out over various fix efforts, I finally had my hosting company restore me back to the old version.
Once I finally got the tech issues resolved, I had another mini-crisis in blogging faith: What the hell am I doing this for? At any given time, I have too much going on to stop and attempt to render comprehensible, bloggable entries about same, hence my habitual silences. But I dislike the feeling of isolation that results. I rely on others’ blogs everyday variously for news, reality checks, entertainment, provocation and enlightenment (not necessarily in that order). Seems like it wouldn’t kill me to respond every so often.
But that’s the thing, I just can’t. I start long, soul-searching responses that I can never complete, which then languish as drafts for months on end.
Take for example last year, after I Blame the Patriarchy’s Feminism and the Feed Bag. Its author, the infamous Twisty Faster, had been responding to an article on Alternet, “Is Dieting Anti-Feminist?” about Ariel Meadow Stallings’ effort to reconcile her feminism with her experience as a Weight Watchers participant. In taking issue, for example, with the article’s final sentence, “And the vanity pay-offs make me forget all about feminism, if only for a minute,” Twisty could not have known this was an editor’s alteration of Stallings’ sentence as it had originally appeared on her own website: “And the vanity payoffs are great.” (Which, while it doesn’t invalidate all of Twisty’s criticisms, it clearly does change the implications of the piece.)
As a reader of both IBtP and Ariel’s site, Electrolicious, I was dizzied by the fracas, with hundreds of commenters weighing in (no pun intended) on numerous post threads. (See, for example, links tagged on del.icio.us by Ariel herself, tellingly, with “shitstorm.”) I had lots to say in response, both generally (on the politics of feminism and body image) and specifically (my experiences around both voluntary and, during periods of extreme poverty, involuntary weight loss), but for the life of me I couldn’t complete the post I started about it.
The draft’s first working title, Evil, thy name is Pillsbury Toaster Strudel was patently ridiculous. The relevant excerpt:
I am not the one in this house with the gall to have purchased the box of Cream Cheese and Strawberry Toaster Strudel (oh no: when groceries are left to me, it’s nearly all Good, Sensible Hippie Food - to the spousal unit’s and my childrens’ chagrin), but I am the one who has consumed most of it. (Specifically, while in a week-long PTSD-driven anxiety haze, with obvious roots in - need I say it? - patriarchy.)
The draft title that took its place, meanwhile, was sinfully clunky, not to mention opaque: “Eating the peaches” as metaphor for symbiotic gain and loss, with discursive commentary on recent skirmishes in the “Feminist Fat Wars.” Another mericifully brief excerpt (if only to explain the ‘peaches’ bit):
Yeah, I get that fat doesn’t mean unhealthy per se. For me, the issue is not the weight itself, but the ways I acquire it. Or, for that matter, the ways I have sometimes lost it. I was as distressed in 1993 with my sudden weight loss of around 35 pounds as I would be later over weight gain I’ve experienced at other times, precisely because the weight loss was involuntary: my very ill, unemployed and unemployable girlfriend at the time needed my constant care, and what little food we could scrounge up from various sources went almost exclusively to her. And in that summer, the pattern for our next four years together was set: if, at any given time, we had a can of peaches, I would drink the juice; she alone would eat the peaches…
Here, I was grappling with issues reaching well beyond feminism and body image per se. My weight has varied by as much as 65 pounds over the last eight years, during which time involuntary deprivation of food (even while economic struggles have continued) has never been an issue. It’s pragmatically and philosophically useful for me to explore why I continue to be caught up in this cycle. But in the process, do I want to expose myself to others’ (even well-meaning) criticism of what is, after all, a deeply painful situation? Besides my inability to fully process events as they are happening (witness this post, or, say, my entire The Past is Not Dead blogging category), I’m just not as tough as women like Ariel when it comes to dealing with the scorn of the (variously well-meaning and vicious) blogular masses.*
Audre Lorde famously wrote, “Your silence will not protect you.” I am conscious, always, of how true this is, even as I retreat again and again into silences of all kinds, constantly going ‘off-radar’ whether in response to specific post-traumatic triggers or seemingly random stimuli, like post threads in the blogosphere. Why can’t I just come out with it?
Of course, the answer to this question is as obvious as it is excruciatingly painful to admit: I’m confronting a confluence of shame-sources, from past experiences with poverty to sexual harassment and abuse, which have engendered intense and seemingly implacable feelings of body-hatred, to the variously maladaptive strategies I’ve cleaved to over the years for coping with such events. My present weight isn’t a consequence of blithely rejecting patriarchal paradigms about the female body; I’m (comparitively?) fat because I eat to excess (while engaging in no appreciable physical activity) whenever I am completely freaked out, which is often. THAT is why my present physical dimensions are unacceptable to me; as unacceptable, indeed, as was my previous (albeit brief) experience of involuntary, rapid weight loss. Just as my human functioning is grossly undermined by my perpetual insomnia and sleep deprivation, so it is also undermined by my being overweight; both problems are the direct result of maladaptive and, yes, disabling coping strategies.
Certainly, I’m not impervious to those cultural messages that seek the “purposeful physical diminution” (Twisty’s phrase) of women as a class - messages which are at the misogynist center of the diet industry as a whole. (Here, the midnight actions of radical feminists who have, for example, superglued the locks at Jenny Craig centers make perfect sense to me.)
But as I struggle to change my life, to improve both my physical and emotional health, there is a lot of experimention to see what does and doesn’t help. I feel as conflicted about “dieting” as I do, for example, about psychiatric medications; as such, at any given moment I may be dieting or not, “on my meds” or not.
I do know that I feel physically and emotionally better when I am able to refrain from compulsive eating habits (as when I’m sticking to a given diet), and when I am able to force myself out of the house (despite anxiety attacks over environments like our local gym) in order to exercise. This, in itself, is not about kowtowing to patriarchal expectations about female behavior and appearance; in fact, it’s ultimately about rejecting the residual influences of all that internalized, sexist rot.
Which, essentially, is what I was trying to get at with those original, unfinished drafts, almost a year ago when that ‘fat as a feminist issue’ brouhaha erupted. I suppose it’s better to have finally summoned this (still partial) response, than if I’d continued to stew in silence. Now of course, having knocked out this, I still have hundreds more languishing drafts on other, equally if not more important subjects, few of which I will likely return to.
But, hell, I had to (re-) start somewhere.
*For two excellent examples of this enviable ‘toughness’ quality in feminist bloggers, to which I can only hope to aspire, see here for how Ariel summed up the aforementioned shitstorm situation, and Twisty’s characteristically hilarious Guidelines for Commenters.