William F. Buckley archives

Semantic quibbles #3: Conservatism

Here’s Mike Tennant at LewRockwell.com Blog, quasi-approvingly quoting Jacob Heilbrunn’s summary of Bill Buckley:

Jacob Heilbrunn writes: Buckley wasn’t a radical conservative. He didn’t believe in trying to destroy the Eastern Establishment; instead, he wanted to reform it. Therein lies the entire problem.

Hold up. I’m lost.

In what possible sense of the word conservative is it a genuine conservative’s goal either to smash or to reform the ancien rĂ©gime?

Maybe this political debate is really about something other than what Tennant, or Heilbrunn, or for that matter Buckley, thinks it is about.

Further reading:

Pot Meets Kettle at The Corner

Corner-Dude-Hardly-Anyone's-Ever-Heard-Of cites a Washington Monthly piece on Lyndon LaRouche in a post that ends:

One of the most interesting parts of the piece is the flashback to the days when LaRouche was attracting intellectuals as followers. It's a sharp contrast with the vulgar, slogan-chanting goons who pass out his unreadable propaganda today.

Buckley